Welcome! edit

Hello, Justmangalore, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Kulala, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 12:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi edit

Hello Justmangalore (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

  The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.


--NeilN talk to me 16:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Per your user page, please read WP:NOTSOAPBOX. --NeilN talk to me 16:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

Hi, Justmangalore. Your userpage indicates that you have come to Wikipedia to fight for your community, and your post on User talk:Sitush shows that you have tried to get other people to come here and do the same. None of that is appropriate on Wikipedia, which is a project for creating a neutral encyclopedia. Please read our policy Neutral point of view and also Righting Great Wrongs, a short guideline section which is especially relevant to your situation. Bishonen | talk 16:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC).Reply

I'm quitting edit

But whatever I edit in the page gets re edited. Justmangalore (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

You'll find you won't be able to slant a Wikipedia page to your preferred version by recruiting people who agree with you to come here and support you. That's not how Wikipedia works. Please see WP:MEAT, which is policy. Bishonen | talk 17:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC).Reply

January 2018 edit

 
To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. NeilN talk to me 17:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

For deliberately falsifying article content. --NeilN talk to me 17:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disruption edit

I have reverted this. We go off sources, not your opinion. If you have reliable sources that say otherwise then we can include them as well as the current source. I think you are likely to find yourself blocked or topic banned if you continue in this vein. - Sitush (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

And you have just done it again. Pinging NeilN (talk · contribs). - Sitush (talk) 13:58, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism.

February 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 14:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Temporary block to stop disruption until topic ban is imposed. --NeilN talk to me 14:16, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

For continued disruption on Kulala, I have decided, in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the terms of this community discussion, to impose the following sanction on you:


You are indefinitely Topic banned from anything related to social groups of South Asia including but not limited to castes and clans such as Kulala etc across all namespaces of the English Wikipedia.


This sanction has been logged at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction to the community at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me on my talk page, before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. NeilN talk to me 14:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'd advise you to show you can contribute constructively to other subject areas before making any appeal. --NeilN talk to me 14:37, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for Violation of topic ban placed under WP:GS/Caste. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 10:46, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 15:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)Reply