Justiceforall911

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pfizer. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pfizer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pfizer. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 17:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:52, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 Hours for Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

The machine at work...blocked for posting sourced, factual material. What a joke!

Since you just evaded this block as Justiceforall411 (talk · contribs) I have extended your block to 48 hours. Hut 8.5 19:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justiceforall911 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Abusing multiple accounts. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)