Jphillst

Welcome!

Hello, Jphillst, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

About "Genesis" album cover

Hi Jphillst, I removed that statement mainly because the quantity of shapes to album tracks don't match up. I think the statement should remain out of the article unless a reliable 3rd party source is found, as per WP:RS. If you think that bit of trivia should be included despite that Wikipedia policy, feel free to ask about it on Talk:Genesis (album) so other editors can have some input on the issue as well. If a consensus appears I'll abide by it. Cheers. Robotman1974 21:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi again. I just saw your comment on Talk:Genesis (album). I'd never seen that track list image before, so I thought the statement was referring to the album cover. My original point about the numbers not matching is now moot. If you want to add that statement to the article again, I think you should upload that image to Wikipedia (under the fair use album artwork rationale) and then add it to the article as a thumbnail next to the statement. You can ask me for help if you want to know the best way of doing that. Cheers. Robotman1974 22:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Tony Banks

If the edit was not vandalism, then I myself apologise. Removal of parts of articles is perfectly legitimate so long as you justify your decision on the talk page. Edits are also less likely to be identified as vandalism if you edit under a username, so if you had been logged in at the time I probably wouldn't have reverted it. Anyway thanks, keep up the good work, LibLord 14:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

About the recent merges

Removed the following from my comments in Talk:Nursery Cryme since it was rather critical of your actions in an unnecessarily public forum.

The thrust of your arguments for deleting this section is that you wish to necessitate having the song stubs restored to contain this information. This appears to be disrupting Wikipedia to make a point.

Pointed, tactical deletions against consensus are edit warring, and persisting with such edits may (even with proper edit summaries) be considered vandalism. Your Talk page comment was posted while the AFD discussion was still current; since your points were directly relevant to the AFD, you might have receive more replies there. / edg ☺ ☭ 13:04, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

re: my Keep It Dark edit

Jphillst: you asked me: In the article on Genesis's Keep It Dark, is there any reason you took out the part about the band members playing on different downbeats? I felt this was an important aspect which contributed to the song's unusual structure. I didn't take it out - I replaced it with text that I thought was more accurate. Specifically: (1) I don't see any reason that syncopation doesn't describe the effect in the song, and (2) calling it a 6/4 time signature implies a composite meter - in this case, two beats per measure, the dotted-half note getting the beat, like a slow waltz - when, in fact, it's a simple meter and 3/2 is therefore a better choice. If you disagree on either count, we can take it to the talk page for the article and see what the consensus is. Seriously, though, no malice intended on my part, and anyway, like you, I like the syncopation of KiD - it is, indeed, what gives it much of its flavor, IMHO. --Jay (Histrion) (talk • contribs) 20:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jphillst. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jphillst. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)