That is nonsense. You can clearly see that this page is POV! I was simply blanking a bogus section that requires new work.
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Vatican Bank. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
I don't see anything wrong. If you read the hidden HTML comment, it is sourced. Blanking an entire section without talk page discussion is frowned upon. -Royalguard11(Talk)(Desk) 03:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Yes, it is "sourced". Does that mean that the source has any credibility? Run a google search on "The Moneychangers: How the Vatican Bank Enabled Roberto Calvi to Steal 250 Million Dollars for the Heads of the P2 Masonic Lodge". There are THREE hits. Likewise, check out Wikipedia's own article on John Loftus. He isn't exactly the most credible source.
If Wikipedia allowed citations of any and every conspiracy theory, it would be full of junk.