Jonah Ayers

All other news found in archive. Thanks, and goodnight.

Wiki-Stalker

• My Wiki-Stalker is

So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his wiki-stalking of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of wikipedia and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

I have removed all postings here to the archive in the spirit of positivity. let's see how long the truce shall last. Credit goes to Derex for working with meJonah Ayers 20:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

The Archive can be found here

If you post any personal information about a user you will be instantly blocked indefinitely from editing this site. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Disputed article

Jonah, you've been reported on WP:AN/I regarding one or more articles you've created, which are perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have been created for the purposes of harassment. Could I ask you please to consider dropping this issue, regardless of how it started? I'm prepared to discuss this with you by e-mail if you'd like, so please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you'd like to try that. In the meantime, I'd like to delete the recent article that's causing the problem, because I think it's fairly clear the person is non-notable, and the reason for creating it does seem to be related to the dispute between you. Please e-mail me and we can discuss this in detail if you'd like to. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. You mention the case with Rangerdude; if you saw that, please don't make the same mistakes, because look what ended up happening. In his case, the whole thing seems to have started as a misunderstanding, and maybe there's a similar misunderstanding here, but once these things escalate, they take on a life of their own, and everyone loses. The subject really isn't notable enough, and if he is, someone else will create it. It looks very bad to suddenly create an article on someone you're involved in an on-going dispute with. Would you mind e-mailing me (or posting here if you prefer) with some details? I'd like to try to stop this escalating any further if I can. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Thanks, Jonah. I honestly have no knowledge of the Biff Rose page. I've been asked a couple of times to look at it, but I haven't done it (or at least don't recall doing it), and this was a long time ago. Whatever the dispute is, it's time that it stopped, and I'd like to help with that. I was hoping you could tell me what it is you're trying to achieve that you feel is being thwarted, and we could start from there. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Hi, I haven't been following the discussions on Biff Rose, but I notice you have been making several edits in the last few hours. Please be aware of the 3 Revert Rule. If you revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked for 24 hours. Just want to make sure you're aware of the rule. User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Personal details

Jonah, I would like to try to help sort out the dispute between you and the other editor, but I have to tell you that, if you insert any more personal details about this or any other user into any of the namespaces, including the main namespace, you're likely to be blocked without further warning, perhaps indefinitely. I hope it won't come to that, and that you'll e-mail me and let me know whether I can help to sort things out. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 09:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, as you've continued posting personal details, this account has been blocked indefinitely. I'm very willing to unblock if we can come to an agreement that you will stop harassing this user (or doing anything to make him feel he's being harassed). You're welcome to contact me by e-mail if you would like to discuss it. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

For any admins needing to know the background, see here. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 01:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

E-mail

Jonah, you keep posting with sock puppets to my talk page saying I haven't responded to your e-mail. But I haven't received an e-mail from you. If you genuinely want to discuss the issue, by all means get in touch using the link on my user page. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 09:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:BbiffRose.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BbiffRose.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)