Welcome! edit

Hello, Johnjgillis, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

September 2013 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Alfred Zappala has been reverted.
Your edit here to Alfred Zappala was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/PassingTheMultistateBarExam) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Zappala, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Closed deletion discussions are closed deletion discussions/ Please leave them alome Fiddle Faddle 15:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Zappala, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. If you disagree with the deletion please follow the insyructions at the head of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Zappala to take the matter first to the closing admin, and then, if not satisfied, to Deletion Review. Removing the closure has precisely no effect and makes you look less adult than you might wish. Fiddle Faddle 15:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Zappala, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doing the same thing repeatedly expecting it to have different results WILL result in a block. Follow the rules. A closed discussion is a closed discussion. You may NOT add to it, however good your intentions. Fiddle Faddle 15:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

This forum is new to me. I apologize. I was simply trying to add support for my position, and did not realize I was deleting comments of others. Please advise where I should have posted this stuff so that I may direct these comments in the proper way. I have limited time and resources. Per the guidelines, I attempted to "undo" the deletion of Alfred's page after an editor deleted the page too quickly, in my opinion.Johnjgillis (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

See the section below. Also see the top of the closed deletion discussion. Equally there is nothing to prevent you from creating a substantially different article from the prior one, one that asserts genuine notability. Tp do this with success, the more so since you are new here and have limited times, I commend the WP:AFC process to you, including every step of the review process. Or you may ask for the currently deleted article to be placed in your user space to be worked on. Again I commend the WP:AFC process to you if you choose this route. Fiddle Faddle 15:37, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

To contest the outcome of the deletion dIscussion edit

First, talk to Crisco (the link goes to their talk page in the right place), the admin who closed the discussion. Please do not attempt any further edits to the closed discussion. Fiddle Faddle 15:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Just to make sure you see the reply, Crisco has replied. You will need to watch that talk page so that you know when he's replied and whether you need to reply to him.
Good luck with the article. Fiddle Faddle 08:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot edit

 

Hi Johnjgillis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Alfred Zappala, in Lawrence, MA speaking about The Sicilian Project, May 2013.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Alfred Zappala, in Lawrence, MA speaking about The Sicilian Project, May 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply