Johnccmay
Speedy deletion of Career Academies UK edit
A tag has been placed on Career Academies UK requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 18:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Copyright violation in John May (Scouting) edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on John May (Scouting), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because John May (Scouting) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting John May (Scouting), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here. CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
This appears to be a direct copy of this and so is a copyright violation. However, it seems that you may be the subject of this article and hence the copyright holder. For this to be appropriate on wikipedia you would have to release theo material on your web page under a free license or into the public domain. Please ask me or other members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting if you need help. Ignore the bot warning above. I added a tag for speedy deletion and then removed it. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
John, if you can convince me that this organisation is notable, I can restore it and help you to make it stick. However, I am not convinced at present that it is notable. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi John, I will reply here, although I prefer to keep the discussion in one place. Please add your reply here, not on my talk page. Your talk page is on my watch list so I will see it. It looks as if "Career Academies UK" may be notable enough to recover and work on, but we need to see whether there are any third party sources. In essence, notability in wikipedia terms means "have other people in reliable sources noticed it?". Can you provide such sources? I will look at it further during the week. The article on yourself is more urgent, as it could be deleted if others notice it is a copy of your web page. You may also be seen as having a conflict of interest in editing an article about yourself. This is not encouraged although it is not banned. You can edit where you have a conflict of interest, but you need to be careful. If in doubt put the material on the talk page and ask others to consider adding it. Again, with your article, we need third party sources who have noticed you. Isn't there a press release about your appointment to WOSM? Your appointment came to my attention when researching Scouting in London to rewrite that article, and I think there was something. You can put your web page under a free license or we can rewrite the article using that and other sources, but not copying your wen page. I recommend the later.
Have you seen Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting and its various subpages. There are good people from all over the world hanging out there who can help. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Brian, many thanks for all your support on this. Firstly, Career Academies UK. The following third party comments may be of help: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/may/14/4 http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/support_services/article1719273.ece http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/speeches/search_detail.cfm?ID=797
Now, me. I would be delighted if someone else were to pen the biog of me, but as the only source would be likely to be the biog that is freely available to people to download from my website (which they use generally to introduce me when I speak in public) I suspect it would not look very different. However, perhaps the two media releases from The Scout Association might help: http://www.scouts.org.uk/news_view.php?news_id=88 http://www.scouts.org.uk/johnmay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnccmay (talk • contribs)
John, I'll try to look at this sometime this week. Possibly Chris will look at your article. He is responsible for a lot of articles on World Committee members and similar. Please sign your comments with ~~~~ even though it is on your own talk page. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Scouting WikiProject edit
 | You are invited to participate in WikiProject Scouting, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Scouting. You may sign up at the project members page.
More information |
Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Do you have an image we could have your permission to use? edit
Hello! Do you have an image we could have your permission to use in your article? Thanks, Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 17:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea. It would have to be released under a free license or into the public domain. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:04, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
I'll provide a photo, released into the public domain, as soon as I can, but I should probably wait until I have a photo of me in my official World Committee uniform. Perhaps you could then tell me how I submit it (and how I officially release it into public domain too!)--Johnccmay (talk) 21:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- OK, just let me, or Chris, know when you are ready. --Bduke (Discussion) 22:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- I've seen pics of you! Congratulations! Now let's get one on here!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)