User talk:JodyB/Archive 6

Pikus-Pace article

FYI. I updated the Noelle Pikus-Pace article if you wish to look. Chris 13:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

KKK EDIT

Hi, I would like to know why you deleted my edit on the KKK page, i had just given some extra information on the origin of the name of the Ku Klux Klan, i would like you to know that this information does appear in a Sherlock Holmes novel and i understand that it is untrue, that is also the reason that i added the word "urban legend".

Please make your intentions clear.

Cheers AB Pooteeweet 12:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Urban legends have no place in a fact-based encyclopedia. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 11:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Awaiting reply

Am Awaiting a reply Pooteeweet 12:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Alabama Project

I would like to join the Alabama project, but I might be inactive for periods of time due to the nature of College Freshman life. Thanks weems 01:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Weems, we would love to have whatever time you can spare. This is a volunteer organization and as such there are no time requirements. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 11:35, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania 2008/Conference of the Americas

Hello, As you may or may not know, Alexandria, Egypt was selected to host Wikimania 2008 [1]. So as to prevent the hard work of the many Wikimedians involved in the Atlanta bid from going to waste, we have decided to host a conference for the Americas. This is in no way an attempt to compete with Wikimania or make a statement against Wikimania.

As one of the people signed up to help with the Wikimania Atlanta bid, we hope you will join us at the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas. We will be having a meeting tonight in IRC tonight (Oct 15) at 9:30PM in #cota-atlanta on irc.freenode.org to discuss the conference. For more information about IRC see [2].

For more information about the Wikimedia Conference of the Americas see http://www.cota-atlanta.org and our wiki http://www.cota-atlanta.org/wiki.

If you do not wish to receive further notices about the COTA please remove your name from our notify list. --Cspurrier 18:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

GA nomination

Is there anything wrong with requesting a reassessment of a failed GA nomination after fixing most of the suggestions? I disagreed with the reviewer's reasoning for doing a quick fail of Mobile, Alabama. Taking his suggestion in the Mobile, Alabama article would further expand a section that the consensus seems to feel is too long already. My opinion was that it would have a more appropriate place in the History of Mobile, Alabama article. It seemed like I was admonished for making the reassessment request so I was just curious. I plan to be much more hands-off on the article henceforth. Altairisfar 06:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there is anything wrong with the reassessment. You may want to dicuss your concerns with the reviewer directly on his talk page. I'll take a look later but I've been out of town this week and am struggling to catch up on real world events. Please don't be discouraged and please don't leave the article. Let's keeping working hard at it! JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 12:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I've still been hard at it in my off time, adding references and reworking it, I really did see the point of the original assessment, but he was so condescending that I got my feelings a little bruised. I did want more of an assessment that what he had given me, that was my point in asking for a reassessment, but the he stayed hands-on through the reassessment too. Is that the way we do it on here? He seemed to have his own bias if you check his userpage. Anyway, my ego is healed, I see now that the article did have much room for improvement, so all is well and I think the article is improving, which is the only thing that matters in the end. Thanks! Altairisfar 19:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

What you must not do is allow one person to discourage your efforts. The GA program, like everything else, is volunteer driven and some folks think they are endowed with power and might. Chances are, they did not intend to offend - rather just a bit incautious in their choice of words.. Keep up the good work! JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 23:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I goofed

I'm so sorry. I accidentally blocked you instead of that IP. Sorry, sorry, sorry. WODUP ^(?) 00:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Not a problem -- it happens. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 00:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

My (KWSN's) RFA

Thank you for supporting my recent (and successful!) RfA. It passed at at 55/17/6. Kwsn (Ni!) 01:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Fictional Philadelphia anchors

Thanks for properly recategorizing the two pages I tagged for speedy deletion, but if something is demonstrably untrue, wouldn't it be best to remove it as quickly as possible? The page was created by a banned user, Rozrozroz. JTRH 19:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, yes and no. If it is demonstrably false then you should simply correct the falsehoods and properly source your material. But simply saying in a template that it is false doesn't leave an administrator much to work with. You must demonstrate that its demonstrably false :). Now, if he is a banned user that may change it altogether, but an administrator would not likely know that. I think you were thinking correctly but just give us more to work with. I'm going to check out his status right now and proceed from there. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 21:27, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

As a followup...Rozrozroz is not a banned user and never has been. He is suspected of being a sockpuppet but at present is not a banned user -- at least I can find no evidence of it in the logs. CSD says that articles by a banned user, created while banned, can be deleted as a speedy if there are no further significant edits by other users. At this point, we'll let the AfD proceed as the end result will be the same. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 21:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)