Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Jocko1982, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Silver Star. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! RP459 (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Jocko Abramovitch edit

I have nominated Jocko Abramovitch, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jocko Abramovitch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. @Kate (talk) 04:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Izzedine 14:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jocko Abramovitch edit

 

A tag has been placed on Jocko Abramovitch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. @Kate (parlez) 01:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 01:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Per your email request edit

Your article has now been userfied to User:Jocko1982/Jocko Abramovitch. Please do not move it back into articlespace. If you feel you have improved the article sufficiently for it to be allowed into articlespace, contact an administrator. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 04:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

This user is a convicted identity fraud artist edit

This user fabricated all his biographical information. His name is Jeremy Clark-Erskine, and is a convicted identity fraud artist currently in custody facing a number of charges. For now, the fictitious information should probably remain published, but with an added section warning people that anyone who did business with "Abramovitch" may have been defrauded. This article makes some claims that may be used as evidence in the prosecution against him, and may be useful to his victims who are currently seeking justice.Elefink (talk) 18:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Reply