Speedy deletion nomination of Fox Bronte

edit
 

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Fox Bronte requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,  . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Jmichaels86. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 00:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fox Bronte

edit

Since this article is a biography of a living person, the standards of referencing statements is a little more stringent. Please source your statements about this person by using references from reliable sources...I see you already know about YouTube and how it is not considered stable or reliable for Wikipedia's purposes, so I don't have to go over that again. Newspaper articles, magazine columns, transcripts of TV/radio interviews or pieces posted on TV/radio stations' websites...those are all usually good, they have a reputation for fact-checking & accuracy, have some form of editorial oversight and the content is fairly stable. For instance National Geographic/Times of London/Rolling Stone/Popular Mechanics/Variety/Wired=reliable sources, but press releases/social networking sites/anonymous blogs=not reliable. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ian Dennis

edit

I have restored the article Ian Dennis that you overwrote. The page already exists at Ian Dennis / Fox Bronte. Tassedethe (talk) 22:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply