Welcome! edit

 
A cup of warm tea to welcome you!

Hello, JimGreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

re Economic Inclusivism edit

 
Hello, JimGreen. You have new messages at Trevj's talk page.
Message added 07:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply
And again. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 09:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Economic Inclusivism (January 2) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 01:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Economic Inclusivism edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Economic Inclusivism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. freshacconci talk to me 03:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 04:06, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This includes using Wikipedia as a soapbox to promote your own views or agenda. Acroterion (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

No original research edit

Mr Green, I am sorry you are having trouble, but Wikipedia is not for what you want to do: publish your original ideas. The copyright issue, while important to us, could be overcome by you making a formal release; but that would not help, because the real issue is that Wikipedia does not publish original work. It is worth reading the policy WP:No original research in full, but key passages are:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

"Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources."

See also Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply