User talk:Jheiv/Journal of Forensic Accounting Discussion

Additions of R.T. Edwards, Inc links

• http://.rtedwards.com
• http://.edwardspub.com

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 (talk) 02:54, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 03:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

R.T. Edwards, Inc links

Accounts

Jheiv (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)
68.45.246.110 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot)

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia to advertise you will be blocked from editing.

This is your last warning. The next time you insert advertising or a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. --Hu12 (talk) 03:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Please read,:

• SPAM

• • Source soliciting
• Conflict of interest
  • Editors who have a conflict of interest
  • Accounts used for promotion
  • Law Of Unintended Consequences
• What Wikipedia is not
  • Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising
• Wikipedia:BLOCK#Disruption
  • Persistent spamming
  • Accounts that appear, based on their edit history, to exist for the sole or primary purpose of promoting a person, company, product, service, or organization in apparent violation of Conflict of interest or anti-spam guidelines.--Hu12 (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hu, I think this is a good-faith editor, though with COI. If I am not sure all the journals are important, but they deserve a chance at AfD. If there is any chance that the articles are acceptable, he should not be blocked. DGG (talk) 01:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

How to write journal articles

I've been working in large part on improving articles about magazines and journals since I joined WP--I'm now one of the many administrators here--so let me tell you what is actually needed for improving these articles, because improvement is needed, and in more respects than mentioned above. Articles should: Give information about how frequently it is published, the starting date of publication, any previous titles, and the dates of title changes. If it is available online, say so, and give the date of beginning availability. List the editor in chief, if there is one. Say what company or institution he comes from. Put a link for his name and the institution name. WP uses these links in evaluating importance of the people. Even if its a red link, use it, so we know we might need an article. If the company or institution is red, check if you have the proper form. List the major indexes that cover it--just the major ones, and just the relevant ones--for example, Chem Abs indexes every journal that ever has a chemical article, but just the chemical articles, so its only appropriate for chemistry & engineering title. If it's covered by Web of Science or by Scopus , say so. If it should be in Journal Citation reports--a f give the current impact factor in the form: The 2006 impact factor is x.xx, which is 4th of 40 in the engineering subject category. the "of 40" part is to clarify if its 4th of 4, or 4th of 40. Give a footnote reference to Journal Citation Reports (brackets as specified) If you give these for any, you must give them for all journals, even if they are last in the class. But if they are not included, you don't have to say anything. Give the circulation, if you give it for all magazines of the class. The reference for this can be BPA--if you use it include the word "audited" (and please write an article on BPA so people know what it is) but I normally use Ulrich's, even though the figures are approximate. Link to Ulrich's. ALWAYS give the ISSN, both print and online. Use the journal infobox template on at least all academic publications--no reason not to use it for them all. [1]

It should not: List the editorial board, or any people other than the editor in chief. Have the typical sentence used in ads and web pages: "This magazine is intended for ... (it's almost always obvious), but if the contents or orientation is much different than expected from the title, it should say so. mention pricing, or through what packages it is available. EXCEPT that if it is available through major full-text service like Lexis or Ebsco , say so, linking them.

Frankly considering the extremely small circulation of J Forensic Accounting, and its absence from major indexes, I am not sure about the notability, and I do not promise to support at AfD. I think the approach would be to try to show it as possibly the most important in its particular niche of Forensic accounting; if that's the case, the article might well hold .

If you need further assistance, email me from my user page. DGG (talk) 02:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)