User talk:JetBlast/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Page Curation newsletter

Hey JetBlast. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Impressive, Thanks for letting me know! --JetBlast (talk) 12:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Unused fair use images

Hi! If a fair use image is unused, there is no need to start a deletion discussion. There is a semi-speedy tag which will lead to deletion after a week if the file remains unused. Just go to Twinkle's "DI" tag and select "orphaned fair use". Alternatively, do nothing: there is a bot which tags orphaned fair use files automatically once in a while. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, i didn't know. --JetBlast (talk) 18:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Why change from Vector to JPG??

The vector was not near the actual SWA takeoff logo. You can fix the one that is their now if you would like but the old one just brought a false logo to the page. Kairportflier (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

It was identical to the .jpg. It took a long time to get someone to make that, making vector images is not easy. --JetBlast (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

System requirements source

Hello, JetBlast. You have new messages at Talk:Windows 8.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smintair (2nd nomination)

Hello, JetBlast. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smintair (2nd nomination).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Shanghai Pudong International Airport

Can you keep an eye on this article? User:FIRSTORIE has been making minor updates to the article but continue to remove the sources for new routes on that page. A couple of new services/resumptions on that page are not sourced and they need to be tagged a "Citation Needed". Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 05:50, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Yep no problem! --JetBlast (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Windows Server 2012 processor architecture

Hello, JetBlast

Your most recent edit summary suggest that perhaps you do not know this: There are many 32-bit and 64-bit CPU architecture around us. Example of 32-bit: IA-32, ARM, MIPS, etc. Example of 64-bit: x64, Itanium (IA-64), Itanium 2, etc.

MOS:COMPUTING has more on this matter.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Okay, then let's remove all three ambiguous instances, not just one. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 08:02, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Virgin Australia Callsign change

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Please continue this discussion at Talk:Virgin Australia

---

Hello JetBlast, Thanks for your comment, nevertheless it is sourced. Source is Virgin Australia FlightOps... Next to the official source, check out:

• www.liveatc.net - listen to the radio, verify yourself
• Discussion @ LiveATC: http://www.liveatc.net/forums/listener-forum/virgin-australia-callsing-change/msg56691/
• Discussion @ FlightAware: http://discussions.flightaware.com/post138456.html
• PPPrune: http://www.pprune.org/dg-p-reporting-points/498217-velocity.html
• Aussie Aviator: http://www.theaussieaviator.net/threads/new-virgin-callsign.34761/
• ...

Again, my source = VOZ FlightOps Or you may call them: (07) 3295 3000 You most probably won't find an official communication made by Virgin Australia Cheers! --Voz410 (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

If you are going to put it in you need to source it properly, please read the wikipedia guide Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. Forums are not a credible source. Please revert your changes until you can do it. I have altered an Administrator about this issue. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

How about live ATC recordings? http://archive-server.liveatc.net/ybbn/YBBN-Twr-Oct-28-2012-0730Z.mp3 right at the start of the file... If that still does not proofs it for you, i can't help it. --Voz410 (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure, ask on the talk page of Virgin Australia. Until we resolve this please remove your changes. --JetBlast (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Just thought about this again, the source is not good enough because it doesn't indicated that all the callsigns have been replaced with a single one. --JetBlast (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

As requested - It's there. And i don't see a need to remove it, as it is a fact that the callsigns changed. Easily to proof via LiveATC (which is not a forum, in case you don't know it). Listen to LAX for the next VOZ arrival, then you get the non-existance of VAU, or New Zealand for no more PBYs... Cheers mate --Voz410 (talk) 20:23, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

It is not evidence they have all been replaced with a single callsign. It is also not proof that the IATA & ICAO codes have been replaced. It isnt good enough. Until we have this evidence that is required on wikipedia please revert your changes. --JetBlast (talk) 20:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Edit to AirTran Airways

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

I reverted an edit you made to the fleet table of that article in which you removed info about them being the 717's launch customer. And you said that it was "policy" to not have that info and linked to Wikipedia:WikiProject Airlines/page content. (I know what part you're referring to.) That's a style guide, and is not a policy. In my opinion it's indeed encyclopedic to say that AirTran was the 717's launch customer. And the requirement for things to be encyclopedic is one of the five pillars, which we all know are the only rules on Wikipedia. The WikiProject style guide is important, but other policies are more important. And I've had issues with you over this part of the project guidelines before, so can we sort it out please? Thanks, Comp dude¹²³ 23:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

"You have had issues" While you are taking this stance i find it hard to communicate with you. There is no need to be rude. I stick by the edits i have made, that kind of detail is not for the fleet table. We could start putting in all sorts of detials in there. It should be strictly fleet details only as its a fleet table. --JetBlast (talk) 23:32, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It's a part of the guideline I don't agree with, so that's why I don't agree with your removals. A couple days ago, you edited Alaska Airlines and removed info about number of aircraft to be delivered and retired from the table citing the same policy. (Yes, I do recognize that you said the info was unsourced. While that was true about the # of ETOPS-configured planes, the deliveries/ retirements are sourced in ref 75.) Note that I didn't revert your edit in that instance. —Comp dude¹²³ 23:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Also, the content you removed is fleet details. —Comp dude¹²³ 23:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Being the launch customer of an aircraft has nothing to do with the individual fleet details of an airline --JetBlast (talk) 23:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

How so? In my opinion being the "launch customer" is definitely noteworthy has everything to do with the individual fleet details of the airline. —Comp dude¹²³ 05:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

What about info such as "5 aircraft of Type X to be retired in 2013"? Why don't you consider that worthy of being put in the fleet table? I think it should be, and I think this even more so than info about launch customer. It is totally related to details about the fleet. How on earth could it not be? —Comp dude¹²³ 05:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Well the retirement stuff makes it sound like a plate spotters site. Anyway lets agree to disagree and not fallout? --JetBlast (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

I don't know of any plane-spotter sites that say stuff like "2 aircraft to be retired in 2013," etc. I'd rather agree to solve this and not shove it aside. —Comp dude¹²³ 21:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Well i wont change my mind, so best agree to disagree. --JetBlast (talk) 22:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok then, whatever. BTW would you care if this info was presented as prose; are you just objecting to the fact that it's in the table? —Comp dude¹²³ 22:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Just the fleet table. --JetBlast (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

OK good. —Comp dude¹²³ 23:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nomination of PwnageTool for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PwnageTool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PwnageTool until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cantaloupe2 (talk) 02:45, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

I stuffed up on Heywood Community High School (I was after the New South Wales school, formerly Sutherland High): I should have read a bit more of the Lead. Sorry. I'm glad you were on the ball.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Ah no worries, no need to be sorry, its just one of those things! I used to work at the school of the article you editing before they closed it. I also used to live in Brisbane and worked in Sydney and been in Sutherland Shire. --JetBlast (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Windows Server 2012 logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Server 2012 logo.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Windows Server 2012 editions table". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!

Guide for participants If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form. What this noticeboard is: It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction. What this noticeboard is not: It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct. It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums. It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN. It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy. Things to remember: Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion. Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page. Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~". If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage. EarwigBot operator / talk 13:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC) A kitten for you! hi, how are you? i made a account on wepidia today, i have not idea how i will use it and procedure of working on wikipedia, if you will give information about the working on wikipedia that will very helpful information for you, i think you are understanding what i am requesting from you for my help, i am waiting here for favourable reply of you........thanks Jawad Janjua (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Windows RT Edit War (sigh) Please contribute to the poll on Talk:Windows RT. (You are being asked because you commented on Windows 8.) Tuntable (talk) 23:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Copa Airlines logo.png) Thanks for uploading File:Copa Airlines logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 23 November 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:Germanwings Logo.svg) Thanks for uploading File:Germanwings Logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Merry Xmas! Snoozlepet (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Snoozlepet (talk) 05:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC) SWA Logo Hi, could you fix the Southwest.com takeoff logo to the same format as other airline pages. I notice it has a white background and is choppy. Thanks! Aviationspecialist101 (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Will see what i can do. We had a real good vector version but someone stuffed it up. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 20:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Re: Talk Page Editing Hello, JetBlast. You have new messages at Codename Lisa's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Images Hi! I found this edit Now, I understand that you want to reduce clutter in the article. However it is customary for a company article to have a photograph of its headquarters. So at minimum I would like to have an image of the Air France headquarters in this article. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Spoiler I DID take it to the talk page BEFORE your suggestion. Let my change sit. Why ruin it for those not in the know. It seems mean-spirited. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Its not that, but you can't just not but details in there just because it hasn't be aired in other countries. It happens when USA shows are aired before they are in the UK. Some countries haven't aired series 2 yet. Where do you draw the line? Just because it hasn't been aired in America doesn't mean it shouldn't be put here. What about those who live in countries where i has been aired? Wikipedia is supposed to be country neutral --JetBlast (talk) The delay amounts to a week. In one week, ALL fans of the show will know. And You CANn omit details if it effects the reader.Not every single detail is included!!! And most details dont matter...in the moment. This one does!And that is our bottom line...the reader. Those that come to the article knowing who dies, dont care. Those that don't know are dumd-founded and MAD. MAD at Wikipedia. Not you. not me. Wikipedia. Why not wait a week. What harm does it do? ```Buster Seven Talk 19:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC) But again just because some countries haven't had that aired doesn't mean we should sensor it. --JetBlast (talk) 19:28, 11 February 2013 (UTC) From Wikipedia:Spoiler My point is this......But note that this does not mean such information must be included, either. Wikipedia is not a textbook, instruction manual, or video game guide; it should contain information appropriate to an encyclopedia article on the subject. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC) BTW...I think you mean censor not sensor. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC) I did sorry, auto correct fail! --JetBlast (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Orphaned non-free media (File:AirBridgeCargo logo.svg) Thanks for uploading File:AirBridgeCargo logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Hello, JetBlast How do you do? I stumbled upon the article and took care of the problem... for now. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Thanks for that --JetBlast (talk) 07:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC) Operating system Not all of these are on Wikidata yet. Could you please add them before removing the interwiki links. —Ruud 18:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC) How do you mean please? --JetBlast (talk) 19:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Instructions can be found at Wikipedia:Wikidata#Manual migration of links. —Ruud 19:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC) US Airways I am very confused on the operations start date/year. The airline started operations in 1990 but an IP added that the airline started operations in 1983 as America West Airlines. Can you take a look? Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC) I have noticed that myself a couple of days ago, like you i am not sure what to think. Not that sure on the history of US Airways. Will see if i can do some research into it. --JetBlast (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC) User:Logan Airport It was cited cited the KLM destinations as a source for KLM serving BOS during 2011-2012 on the stats table. However, on that page BO'S is terminated but there is no source for it. Can you do some research and see whether or not KLM flew to Boston in 2011? Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 19:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC) That's my apology. This whole thing confuses me. I truly have no clue. Ugh! What a mess I created. From what I HEARD (speculation), KLM flew for Northwest up to 2011, when it became Delta service. My error in this was I didn't read carefully and I thought that it was 2010 statistics, not 2011-2012. I apologize to all for my errors. I really so not know Wikipedia or how it works at ALL...sorry. -ConnorLax101 Talkback Hello, JetBlast. You have new messages at Jetstreamer's talk page. Message added 10:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. --Jetstreamer Talk 10:20, 11 March 2013 (UTC) easy jet Hi - You asked me if I would care to explain the source of my change to the easyjet article which said that the company would be a member of the FTSE 100 Index from 18 March 2013. This change is properly sourced to a BBC article viz. [1]. The changes are made over the weekend and take effect from opening of trade tomorrow. Happy to discuss if you have any doubt over this. Best wishes, Dormskirk (talk) 13:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks, didn't know. An edit summary would have been helpful :-) --JetBlast (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2013 (UTC) San Francisco Airport Hi, JetBlast. The only thing I am re-reverting is the information about the tri-jetway setup at Gates A9 and G101, since those are the only two of the six A380 gates that have three jet bridge. The photos will not be reverted. Thanks.-Connor (ConnorLax101 | talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:03, 21 March 2013 (UTC) ok. Thought anymore about the other article? --JetBlast (talk) 21:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC) OK, I found an article online with a picture of gate 101, proving that it is a tri-jetway set-up. http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Giant-A380-jetliner-proves-SFO-planners-were-right-2371963.php#photo-1899699 Hope this helps.-Connor (ConnorLax101 | talk) 21:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC) LAN Airlines Hi! The infobox was large because the name of Santiago Airport is large. Is requires put the name of airport in only one line. You can see US mayors airlines infoboxes. --Wind of freedom (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC) It isn't required to be on one line though is it? --JetBlast (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Logan Airport Cargo Info Hi. I am re-doing the EVA Air part of the deleted info. I found a source (if you want to see it, it'll be up). Thanks. -Connor (ConnorLax101] | talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC) BTW, I am not re-adding any of the other stuff until I find a source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConnorLax101 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Ok :-) --JetBlast (talk) 21:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Not sure I blame you But I suspect Kelly Denis ought to go to AfD since the CSD was removed by A N Other editor. I was tempted to reinstate CSD there, too. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC) It was removed by an IP user, i suspect it was the same person. I can't see someone would find the article when its so new and then remove the tags, right after the creator did the same thing. The exact copy was removed from user space so the admin must agree its just promotional. Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC) That you are probably correct is not in dispute, but to be provably correct you need to file a sock puppet investigation request. I share your thoughts. One way or another the article will go. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Is it worth doing a sock puppet request? Once the person gets the hint i don't think he will come back. If it wasn't for the admin removing the content from the user space i would have done Afd to be honest. --JetBlast (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Not at all :). Suggest you put the nail in its coffin by making your AfD !vote explicit. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.