Shadowgraphy (performance art) edit

I have already removed the maintenance templates. Just a quick point, now that the article is in the mainspace, it is not your article, so open to editing by anyone. – ukexpat (talk) 20:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea why OrangeMike would have added those templates. Have you asked him on his talk page? – ukexpat (talk) 21:54, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
To upgrade the classification you should probably as for the article to be reviewed by the relevant Wikiprojects by leaving a request at their talk pages: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Magic and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Visual arts. – ukexpat (talk) 17:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Texarkana Moonlight Murders nomination edit

JeremeK, I had to revert your new nomination because it erased the old FailedGA template, which must remain, and was also not created using the GAN template, which meant it was incorrectly formatted in a number of ways.

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions, in particular the Nominating section, step 2, which tells you about pasting the GAN template onto the article talk page in order to do the nomination. The GAN template takes care of properly creating a "GA nominee" template with all the correct fields filled out: all you need to supply in the GAN template is the subtopic name. I would do it myself, but that would put my name in the nomination, and it needs to be yours. Best of luck with the new nomination, and remember to paste the GAN template at the top of the talk page, on a new line above the existing FailedGA template. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Texarkana Moonlight Murders may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • them and that they should be "burned in the backyard of 617 North College" [McGee's address]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Texarkana metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

FAC edit

Hi, the nomination is incomplete. You need to create the FAC page by clicking on the red link here [1]. Thanks. Graham Colm (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, Graham Colm (talk), I didn't know anything about this FA process. I believe I have it fixed now. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. JeremeK (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Betty Jo Booker grave marker.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Town That Dreaded Sundown edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Town That Dreaded Sundown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 01:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Town That Dreaded Sundown edit

The article The Town That Dreaded Sundown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Town That Dreaded Sundown for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Town That Dreaded Sundown edit

The article The Town That Dreaded Sundown you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:The Town That Dreaded Sundown for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zanimum -- Zanimum (talk) 12:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 26 April edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Disappearance of Virginia Carpenter was accepted edit

 
Disappearance of Virginia Carpenter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 05:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Junkyard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just letting you know that Clent225 has reported you at WP:3RRNB. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:40, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Outing edit

Posting non-public information about another editor, outing, is considered harassment. Do not do this again or you will be indefinitely blocked. --Guerillero | My Talk 03:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Moonlight Murders edit

I'm wondering what sources you have for "Texarkana Moonlight Murders", other than modern books that cite the wikipedia article. I was able to find sources with "moonlight murderer", but not "moonlight murders". Are the newspaper articles available some place? What do they say? I see your original stub had the "Moonlight Murderer", but it got lost at some point. Dicklyon (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


The term for the Texarkana killings was first published as the "moonlight murders" in a United Press wire in July 1946.

James Presley writes in his book, "Sometime over the years, decades afterward, far from Texarkana, someone labeled the crimes the 'Moonlight Murders'..." (this does not refer to the Wikipedia page).

These websites used this term before the creation of this article:

It can be seen that this term was around and well-known before the Wikipedia page. And I'm way too unmotivated to read through all materials I have. JeremeK (talk) 07:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. No books, but better than nothing. Dicklyon (talk) 08:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I went ahead and moved it again to a descriptive title, since your sources for "Moonlight Murders" are all about the book and the movie, and a few primary news sources. Most sources don't call it that. Your chaotic moves to other titles were not helpful. Dicklyon (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Two out of six sources were about the movie, and none about the book. What would you consider as "most sources"? You trying to change the title (when it doesn't even need it) isn't helpful. The term "Texarkana Murders of 1946" covers all murders in Texarkana in 1946, not just the Phantom murders. JeremeK (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

February 2016 edit

Texarkana Moonlight Murders definitely does not need to list someone Social Security number. It adds nothing to the article, and is likely an invasion of privacy. Do not restore it again. Meters (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

If you don't understand then take it to the talk page. Meters (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Even if the person has been deceased for 70 years? I won't add it back, but it's been on the article for several years now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeremeK (talkcontribs) 22:27, February 7, 2016‎
It doesn't matter how long it has been there, or if the person is deceased. It's unsourced trivia that adds absolutely nothing to the article (which is already extremely bloated in my opinion), and it's personal information which we should not publish. If you disagree then take it o the talk page and see if you can get consensus that it should be included. Just because someone else has published information does not mean that it's useful information for Wikipedia to repeat, or that Wikipedia should repeat it even if it were useful. Meters (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, JeremeK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Texarkana Moonlight Murders, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Meters (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please don't shotgun Texarkana Moonlight Murders with every site you can find that mentions the case. See WP:ELNO. Meters (talk) 08:17, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, JeremeK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, JeremeK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply