User talk:Jaymacdonald/Archive 1

Messages

Hey Jay, just wondering why the page on Edwin VanCleef was deleted, and what I should have done. This information would be useful if I start a page sometime in the future, so that it does not get deleted again. Thank you for your time. The Dud (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply

I am aware that it is your page, I just thought you might like to know many people don't find it polite. And although you three appear to have reached agreement, I still feel that someone should look into it, if only to prevent it happening again Restepc (talk) 20:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Do what you want. I'm no longer interested. Jaymacdonald (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Enrique Carrion notability

Enrique Carrion was amateur world champion.I added the link.German.Knowitall (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I removed the tag. Jaymacdonald (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jared Moskowitz

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jared Moskowitz, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Moskowitz. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. Jaymacdonald (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Centurion (Scarrow novel)

I discovered that Centurion (Scarrow novel) was included on the The Sunday Times (London) list of fiction hardback bestsellers. I can't find the date when The Sunday Times published that list, though. You might want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centurion (Scarrow novel). --Eastmain (talk) 02:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Jay

I wasn't 'attacking' anyone. It was a joke. Lighten up my friend. Rigsy05 (talk) 08:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. Sorry for taking it as an offence. Jaymacdonald (talk) 10:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 09:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

• This is unacceptable. You've seen enough templated messages already. Just stop it, please. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you'll be blocked again. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 21:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. –xeno (talk) 12:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaymacdonald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Attempting to harass other users?". I don't see him getting a ban for phoning my house TWICE and faxing me with spam.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests must address your own conduct. The (alleged) conduct of others is irrelevant with respect to the validity of your block. See WP:GAB. —  Sandstein  20:24, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.