User talk:Jayantanth/Archive 2

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jayantanth in topic Speedy deletion of Harinavi

Speedy deletion of Harinavi edit

 

A tag has been placed on Harinavi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ScarianCall me Pat 17:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 08:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, Jayantanth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Jayantanth/Archive 2|your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

History? edit

I am not able to understand what you want to add to the South 24 Parganas pages. Do you want to write the history of South 24 Parganas as a whole or about places in South 24 Parganas? However, I would like to comment on the citation in the Harinavi page. Nowadays, it is desirable to have in-line cites. Earlier, I had used general references as in the biography pages. I will have to work again to convert those pages into ones with inline cites. My advice to those starting new is to start with inline cites only. Take for example the Cossipore page where I have used full inline cites both from books and the Internet. In the Saptagram page I have used inline cites mostly from books. The cite is a reference to what is written, i.e. if somebody wants he can verify what you are writing from the references. Now take the Harinavi case. Harinavi is not a ‘census town’ and it does not appear anywhere in the census records you have quoted. It is probably part of Rajpur-Sonarpur for census and election purposes. Where is it mentioned? Do you have any references for that? You have mentioned three books as reference. These books have something about Harinavi, but nothing of what is there on the Harinavi page is mentioned in the books. The mere mention of a place does not make it a proper reference. What you write must be supported by the cite. If you are interested in developing town pages, please go through Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities. That will be of some help. I do not know if I have been able to explain things properly. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). You will usually find the tildes at the top left hand side corner of your key board. Regards. - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 11:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Adi ganga.JPG edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Adi ganga.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright edit

I find that you want to use user boxes on your page. Please study Wikipedia:Userboxes and I think things will be a bit easier for you. As regards photographs, you cannot upload copyrighted material. However, photographs older than 100 years are copyright free. You have to mention this in the description column. Regarding source, merely saying 'from a book' normally will not do. You have to be more specific. Mention the name of the book. If it was published more than 60 years ago, mention the date of publication. As per Indian copyright laws some pictures can be used 60 years after publication. There is plenty of information on this in Wikipedia. Study these to avoid pictures being deleted. Regards - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Adiganga1690.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Adiganga1690.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apolapbad o bharat Itihas edit

 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Apolapbad o bharat Itihas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:Atul kulkarni.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Atul kulkarni.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mspraveen (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bengali Wikipedia edit

I am happy that you are interested in Bengali Wikipedia. I am unable to contribute to Bengali Wikipedia. Regards. P.K.Niyogi (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Runa Rizvi" edit

 

A page you created, Runa Rizvi, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  13:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Khela.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Khela.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Chirodini-tumi-je-amar-2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chirodini-tumi-je-amar-2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Love (2008 Bengali film) edit

Found some EL's to prove it a released film. Added to article's page. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Just did some improvements and additions. I think the article will survive. Now we need an article on Riingo the director (and yes, I found his last name - go look), as he is an up-and-comer who is getting a lot of press. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • How can I help with the article? What "alphabeticals" are you speaking of? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:21, 12 September 2008

(UTC)

  • A beter editor than me took care of it. Thanks for bringing it up! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Rudranil Ghosh edit

 

A tag has been placed on Rudranil Ghosh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 05:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • And in the meanwhile.... I put a HANGON on the page. Certainly it offers little to Wiki as it stands, but a quick search found enough for this actor that maybe you can improve in if given a couple days. Make us proud. Fair enough? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • I found out Ghosh won some awards. How could you have missed including these? Anyways... that was enough to have the "speedey delete" tag removed. Now its time for you to improve the article. Take a look at articles for other Indian or Bengali actors and actresses... see how they provide information in a clean and concise manner and provide references for statements that are made. I did a bit of research and found a number of sources you might use to expand the article... including the one of Ghosh winning some film awards. That's important stuff to include. Ask for help if you need it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bengali film actors? edit

The page Category:Bengali film actors is now alphabetical by last name. Is this what you wanted? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bengali film edit

Hi I noticed you;ve begun developing the Bengali films by year. I don't mind as long as you do actually create these pages and don't leave them red-linked. Your're doing a great job with starting these films but some words of advice. Don't category the films as Bengali cinema 2008. I've deleted these categories and the convention at Wp:Films is to display this in the film lists. Just stick to categorizing for example as: 2008 films, Bengali-language films and Indian films. Also try to put the crew of the film in the infobox; it has parameters for cinematogrpahey, editing, writer. producer etc. Keep up the good work and I look forward to seeing all those lists blue linked! The Bald One White cat 11:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Telegraph is definately acceptable, the other is likely to be OK too given the lack of sites covering Bengali film. Now keep those lists coming! The Bald One White cat 11:16, 16 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bengali film actors? edit

The page Category:Bengali film actors is now alphabetical by last name. Is this what you wanted? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I concur, the "standard" would be to list entries by last name, first name, and the only other solution would be to use a literal (Banerjee, Kanu instead of Kanu Banerjee) listing with the last name appearing first. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC).Reply

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open! edit

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:34, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oriya Film Industry edit

Thanks for writing me. I am sorry but I can hardly help you with this. Though I am a fluent speaker, I have practically no knowledge of the Oriya alphabet. Hopefully you will find a user who can help you. Thank you.  Shobhit102 | talk  16:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Infobox actor request edit

Hi - I have never actually been involved with that particular infobox, so I wouldn't really know how to specifically help with your request. You may want to discuss the matter at the infobox's talk page, or look at the template's edit history to see which editors have been actively involved in the infobox's development. Best luck, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 00:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you--Jayanta Nath (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
You need to make a request at Template talk:Infobox Actor. Changes to the infobox require an administrator, so I'm afraid I can't help you myself. Regards. PC78 (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mr_Fantus.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Mr_Fantus.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of 90 Ghanta edit

 

A tag has been placed on 90 Ghanta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Maethordaer (talk) 01:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Skyblogo.gif) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Skyblogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award edit

 

A tag has been placed on Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actor Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 21:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Little context in Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actress Award edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actress Award, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actress Award is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Actress Award, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Supporting Actress Award edit

 

A tag has been placed on Bengal Film Journalists' Association - Best Supporting Actress Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 21:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Welcome edit

Welcome!
 

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sreelekha Mitra edit

 

A tag has been placed on Sreelekha Mitra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LCpl Stephen Bolin, USMCtalk 07:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)Reply