Jaya Soorya 24, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Jaya Soorya 24! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Aranthangi Nisha (December 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft edit

Please don't remove past draft submissions and comments as you did here - [1]. They help reviewers understand the progress that's been made and areas that prior reviewers felt needed addressing. Ravensfire (talk) 23:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, Jaya Soorya 24, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 06:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

January 2021 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Draft:Aranthangi Nisha, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [2] Even in an article draft you need to be sure that any personal data like birthdate or birth place are properly sourced, as including this information without referencing could be considered a violation of the subject's privacy. See WP:BLPPRIVACY. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Draft:Aranthangi Nisha. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [3] Per community policy (see WP:BLPPRIVACY) "BLP [policy] applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, categories, lists, article titles and drafts." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Draft:Aranthangi Nisha here. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aranthangi Nisha (January 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive Draft resubmission edit

This edit is disruptive, since you've done nothing to improve the article since it was declined the last time. If you resubmit this draft again without fundamentally addressing the issues raised by the reviewers, including the lack of sourcing and a failure to adequately demonstrate the subject meets either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR, then it will be considered disruptive and your editing privileges will be interrupted again. Stop wasting volunteers' time. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply