Jaws86

Jaws86, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jaws86! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Ballad upon the Popish Plot has been accepted

A Ballad upon the Popish Plot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Category fix at A Ballad upon the Popish Plot

Good attempts, but cats have to be much narrower than that. For example "Printmaking" is waaaay to broad for an article this specific. In the same sense that an article caldo verde about a Portuguese soup, should go in category:Portuguese cuisine , not Category:Portugal directly. Not a big deal, you develop a feel for it with practice, but basic rule is "as narrow as possible in each applicable category tree".

Nice work overall! Note, any footnote you have to GoogleBooks, plug it into http://reftag.appspot.com and it'll convert it to a full Wikipedia footnote.

Further, a great way to really jazz up an article on a broadsheet is to include an image of said sheet. Any photo of said broadsheet is out of copyright (so long as the photo, regardless of when taken, shows only the original work with no further artistry added), so you can upload any plain image of it to Wikipedia Commons and add it to your article. Note how same was done on the period book The Fable of the Bees. Try it, give it a cool visual.

Thanks for your good article, hope you'll continue to add to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Hood's Progress to Nottingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brythonic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Hood and Little John has been accepted

Robin Hood and Little John, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not use "Ibid"

Wikipeda foonotes are auto-numbered, so if someone were to rearrange the text as a partial rewrite later, footnote #8 "Ibid" could end up becoming footnote #14, leading someone to erroneously believe it's an Ibid of #13, not #7. See WP:Ibid for ways to avoid this thorny issue. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)