JaseC,

A complaint has been made against you in regard to the Nuero-linguistic programming article, with a request for arbitration. The basis of the case is that you are either a sock puppet, or otherwise involved with, breach of wikipedia policy and disruption to that article.

The request can be found at: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration

FT2 09:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


Hello JaseC

and welcome to edit. The NLP page is very deep in terms of research, but it is all well cited, so you are welcome to sift through it and point out any inaccuracies or missed points as you wish. Feel free to research further using the citations as a pointer. Right now the alternative research page needs some attention because a lot of the comments there are bound to be biased. It is fairly easy to spot problems and there are too many for me to comment on at once. Anyway, enjoy and don't worry if you get a sockpuppet label. Anyone speaking negatively about NLP is bound to get one. Regards HeadleyDown 13:19, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Arbitration accepted

edit

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming has been accepted. Please place evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Evidence. Proposals and comments may be made at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Neuro-linguistic programming/Workshop. Fred Bauder 03:00, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply