Declined CSD edit

I have declined your CSD tag on Calpernia Addams. Since this article is sourced, and has been to AFD before, I suggest that if you contest this, to take this page to AFD. -MBK004 19:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aspirin edit

Hi, you recently replaced an edit I reverted on Aspirin. You may have mistaken my edit summary. I was not saying your edit was unsourced; rather, that was another edit that I also reverted in that same edit. I apologize for the ambiguity of my edit summary. However, I don't think your edit fits with the rest of the lead section. I think it would be best to include that information somewhere else in the article, perhaps in one of the various parts of the article (such as pediatrics), that mention Reye's Syndrome. I think it would also be best to word the information somewhat differently. Perhaps "However, one study in Australia.." or "There is also evidence to suggest that..." would be better that "This is true in spite of the fact that a meta-analysis in Australia...". I'm going to go ahead and revert your edit again for now, however, I don't own the article, nor do I wish to become involved in an edit war. While I would greatly prefer that we reach some kind of compromise, if you are convinced that the sentence belongs there, and aren't happy with any of the suggestions I have provided, I think it may be best to gather the consensus of other wikipedians- WP:THIRD may be the best place for this, though you may try WP:RfC if for some reason that does not work. CrazyChemGuy (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Panacos Pharmaceuticals edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panacos Pharmaceuticals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sionk (talk) 11:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply