Jakobrots500

Welcome!

Hello, Jakobrots500, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Massachusetts Route 8 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Massachusetts Turnpike may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{MAint|exit
• |road={{jct|state=MA|I|95|Route|128|city1=Waltham|city2= {{Providence, RI]]}}<br/>{{jct|state=MA|MA|30|city1=Weston|city2=Newton}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Massachusetts Route 127 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• s Memorial]] as well as passing just north of several of the city's major fishing companies (including [[Gorton's of Gloucester]].
• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Massachusetts Route 27 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Jakobrots500, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jakobrots500! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Massachusetts Road Articles

Hello. I noticed that you edited lots of junction destinations for Massachusetts road articles. While I understand your good faith of trying to improve the articles, anything written must be verifiable via a reliable source. In particular, each destination should rely on the actual signs posted on the road. I have been cross-checking your edits with Google Street View and found that they did not match up. That is why I keep reverting your edits. I hope this makes it clear. Please refrain from editing these articles unless you have reliable sources that the articles are incorrect; sometimes they are, but most of the time they aren't, so double check before committing your edits.

Also, please use "Show Preview" to make sure that your edits are displayed as you intended. A few of your past edits broke a template. I think I fixed all of them, so no worries about that. It would be nice, however, to correct your mistakes before they are recorded permanently in the articles' history. These mistakes cost some space on the server, so it is best to ensure everything is right before saving the page. It is okay to mess up once in a while though, so not a whole lot of pressure here. Let me know if you have questions or if I can be of further help. Chinissai (talk) 23:49, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop editing articles that already have references on exit locations. They reflect appropriate contents that respect WP:RJL standards. I put many hours of hard work on this and now am exhausted of reverting your changes. If you think there should really be a change, please discuss it either here or on individual articles' talk pages. Also still, you seemed not to preview any of your edits, resulting in broken templates, which reduce the quality of the articles. Some I am kind enough to fix, others I just reverted. Finally, when you edit an article, it would be nice to add an edit summary so others know what you did. Any further unreasonable edits will be considered disruptive, and I will have to report accordingly. There will not be a third notice. Please either seek help or discuss; don't ignore this message. Thanks for your understanding. Chinissai (talk) 04:45, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Discussion about you occuring on WT:USRD

Hello, This is to inform you that a discussion is taking place on WT:USRD about the similarities of 3 accounts making edits to highway articles. Several editors have opined that the evidence points to a violation of wikipedia policy at WP:SOCK, compelling enough to invoke the WP:QUACK test. Please comment on the the observations below:

Contributions show a similar pattern between 3 editors specifically:[1][2][3]

• Editing primarily from a mobile device
• strong focus on highway articles, 2 of the 3 accounts primarily edit articles about highways in Massachusetts, all 3 have edited at least one article about a highway in Massachusetts
• All 3 accounts have made similar infobox edits on the main or sub-articles of Interstate 90 [4][5][6]
• All 3 accounts have been warned on their talk page about edits to infoboxes that have broken formatting, including 2 of the 3 have been warned by bracketbot [7][8][9]

These observations do not apply to the account Jakobrots500:

• 2 of the 3 accounts have made repeated anachronistic insertions of U.S. Route 66 into infoboxes of highway articles[10][11], both accounts have been previously warned on the talk page about this.
• 2 of the 3 accounts have made similar edits to U.S. Route 6 within a week. [12]
• 2 of the 3 accounts have made erroneous claims about which highway is the longest in the United States: [13][14]

Please comment on these observations here, or on WT:USRD. Dave (talk) 02:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Massachusetts Route 30, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dave (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Please respond to the questions asked on your talk page. I hate to lose a roads article editor. However, several points and questions have been raised on your talk page, that have been left unanswered, and the editing patters that have raised the concern continue. Regards, Dave (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Familygamenight-ss.JPG

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Familygamenight-ss.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑ 23:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Interstate 95 in Massachusetts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dave (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

At the above linked discussion at WT:USRD, evidence has been provided by others of block evasion via IP's. As such I've changed the block to an indefinite block. Dave (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jakobrots500 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #15911 was submitted on Jun 05, 2016 19:03:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)