JakePeraltaB99, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi JakePeraltaB99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
48   Muhammad Jaunpuri (talk) Add sources
30   Abu al-Layth al-Samarqandi (talk) Add sources
99   Ghulam Ahmed Perwez (talk) Add sources
170   2020 in association football (talk) Add sources
22   Nepal women's national football team (talk) Add sources
126   Uzbekistan Super League (talk) Add sources
4,787   COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines (talk) Cleanup
542   Rockefeller Foundation (talk) Cleanup
101   Mi corazón insiste en Lola Volcán (talk) Cleanup
27   Muhammad Abu Zahra (talk) Expand
99   2022 AFC Women's Asian Cup (talk) Expand
13   Hong Kong women's national football team (talk) Expand
31   Süleyman Hilmi Tunahan (talk) Unencyclopaedic
170   Benoît Paire (talk) Unencyclopaedic
178   Football in India (talk) Unencyclopaedic
116   Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar (talk) Merge
30   Atba-e-Malak Vakil (talk) Merge
8   Atba-e-Malak (talk) Merge
5   Order of Service (talk) Wikify
5   Ligiah Villalobos (talk) Wikify
10   Order of Courage (Iran) (talk) Wikify
4   Alīna Šilova (talk) Orphan
3   Arukaino Umukoro (talk) Orphan
2   Mwenda Njoka (talk) Orphan
17   Al-Sharif al-Jurjani (talk) Stub
33   Uzbekistan women's national football team (talk) Stub
6   Feruza Bobokhujaeva (talk) Stub
12   Abu al-Husayn al-Basri (talk) Stub
12   Lianna Narbekova (talk) Stub
19   Ahl al-Ra'y (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:DavidFriendDay.pdf edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DavidFriendDay.pdf, which you've attributed to The City of Boston. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Diannaa, I have asked the Boston Government to send the approval, but it is getting delayed from their end because of the covid times. Can I get an extension for a week to submit the approval?JakePeraltaB99 (talk) 01:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The file can easily be restored when the permission email arrives.— Diannaa (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello Diannaa, I have submitted the permission. Please check and let me know if it is okay. Also, how do I restore the file?--JakePeraltaB99 (talk) 01:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
The permission email will be reviewed by an OTRS agent who will check and ensure that the document has been released under a compatible license. This may take a while, as they have some backlogs, so please be patient. Once this is done the file can be restored. I am not an OTRS agent and do not have access to their email queue. But I can restore the file later once the email has processed.— Diannaa (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

New message from Timtrent edit

 
Hello, JakePeraltaB99. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse.
Message added 13:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This pretty much is my review. There's work to do here. Good start, now see if you can get it over the line Fiddle Faddle 13:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi JakePeraltaB99! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wanted Help to Review My First Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:David Friend has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Friend. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 13:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:David Friend has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Friend. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 17:52, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:David Friend has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Friend. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 18:14, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Friend (August 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:David Friend has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Friend. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 06:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

This may help edit

This essay describes what is needed. You may have to face it that DF is not yet suitable for inclusion here. Businessmen are generally not suitable. Fiddle Faddle 06:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:David Friend edit

  Hello, JakePeraltaB99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Friend, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chris Barish for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Barish, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Barish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Page moved edit

Hello. Please note that I moved the page you created, Synthesia(Company), to Synthesia (company), so that it conforms with the article title policy. Thank you for your contributions. Local Variable (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Synthesia (company) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Synthesia (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GermanKity (talk) 05:19, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Synthesia (company) (May 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Synthesia (company) edit

  Hello, JakePeraltaB99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Synthesia (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:David Friend edit

 

Hello, JakePeraltaB99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Friend".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Roca News edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roca News, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MickyShy (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Earth Brands edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Earth Brands, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MickyShy (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  An article you recently created, Giuseppe Izzo, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place {{AfC submission|T}} atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Silikonz💬 19:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, JakePeraltaB99. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created  Giuseppe Izzo has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Giuseppe Izzo edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Giuseppe Izzo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 02:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Middleware Labs moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Middleware Labs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Middleware Labs (November 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Middleware (company) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Middleware (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jp×g🗯️ 07:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Middleware (company) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Middleware (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dewritech (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

 

Hello JakePeraltaB99. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JakePeraltaB99. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JakePeraltaB99|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. jp×g🗯️ 10:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Middleware (company) edit

  Hello, JakePeraltaB99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Middleware (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Middleware Labs edit

  Hello, JakePeraltaB99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Middleware Labs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Middleware (company) edit

 

Hello, JakePeraltaB99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Middleware".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply