Jaguarjaguar

Welcome and Thanks

Hey, Welcome to Wikipedia, we're a community of people who like to be in control of stuff, etc., etc....I'd really like to thank you for editing the Aimar V of Limoges page...it seems like you have a lot of knowledge about that kind of stuff, and you know the system and what's going on. You also seem to have the same kind of interests as me...maybe I could take you under my wing in the Wikipedia:Adoption program...just something to think about. Again, welcome and thanks. Benjamin 02:56, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou...I've been meddling on Wikipedia (especially Arthurian stuff, Richard I, the crusades and, er, Joni Mitchell) for a while now but have only just nabbed an account. V glad to be welcomed so warmly...I examined this adoption stuff and it doesn't seem too much of a Satanic pact, I'd certainly be glad of a spot of benevolent protection over the wiki oceans

Jaguarjaguar 10:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Joni Mitchell, eh? Anne Hathaway floats my boat...girlfriend's not crazy about her, for some reason or other. The adoption stuff helped me a lot, it's been great to have someone watching over me, making sure I'm not getting into too much trouble, and helping me a bunch with formatting and other general questions. I'm not sure if they'd let me adopt someone since I'm currently adopted, but maybe...if this doesn't work out or you realize just how terrible of a person I am, then I'd look into getting adopted by someone else...it really does help, and it's just a good feeling having support and someone you can ask questions and not look like a nooblet. So, cool, thanks, tell me if you wanna look deeper into this so I can see how many strings I can tweak. (I just finished reading the Mary Stewart Arthurian Trilogy if you care...good reading, I highly recommend them, they're even better the second time) Thanks, Benjamin 00:25, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Charles VI

I am going to remove the link you made to Charles VI of France because it doesn't make sense. I thought the same thing myself, but then I realized that you're not going to garner 15 greats and a grandfather in a space of less than 300 years: that just isn't logical. So, I left the link to the disambig page on Charles VI so people could think what they wanted, since I wasn't sure myself. Again, I'm going to remove the link for the reasons I have stated. Benjamin 21:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I think this Charles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_VI%2C_Holy_Roman_Emperor was the right one. Bit of a moot point now, ah well...

Jaguarjaguar 12:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

You're right: doesn't matter now. I was a bit dubious of that site myself, it didn't seem too great, but it was something. Hey, when responding to a comment, I think it would help you to do a : before you start typing the response...it makes the formatting easier to read. Just some friendly advice... Benjamin 03:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, each colon pushes it one more tab in...like this is two now, and this is three:

and the one below is four

I noticed it from looking at talk pages, I wish someone had told me, though...Benjamin 23:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Richard I of England has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Scarian^{Call me Pat} 13:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)