JMarkendaya (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for editing the David Frawley page. Frawley has written quite a few books for many years and yet his Wiki page is not very well developed. I have tried to help out. I am glad you are doing so also. Agastya21 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to M. P. Pandit may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks BrackedBot. These bracket issues have been fixed.JMarkendaya (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

David Frawley edit

Regarding your recent edit. My preference is not to have separate section heading "Debate on Ancient History". Such debates are well covered in separate articles. Having it in the biography is not necessary. Better just leave the text under the section "reception". Let me know if ok to remove Prodigyhk (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. I thought given Frawleys many books and fields of study, separating the historical information would make more sense. I think this debate with Witzel in 2002 is overemphasized, given the scope of his work. JMarkendaya (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Hinduism edit

 


Hello, JMarkendaya. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!





Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to David Frawley, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. WBGconverse 17:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also, you are asked to refrain from whitewashing subjects, over our articles. WBGconverse 17:42, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

WBGconverse 05:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

WBGconverse 05:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply