I've gone ahead and revoked your ability to edit this page. You may still appeal the block via WP:UTRS or by emailing WP:BASC, but you will need to provide an actual coherent reason why you believe the block should be lifted. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation Online: Community Integration edit

Two articles for creation currently online are Family Support, and Supportive Living. In addition, Community Integration is also new, though related articles can be found in the field of brain injury at community reintegration.

JARacino (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

+==Article Accepted== Aaron Booth: Thank you; the article was revised and has been very useful for over a year now. thank you very much!!

JARacino (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:07, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 22:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you but the article was not ready for submission yet (neither completed or wiki markup); it was resubmitted with 98 references on May 6, 2012; however, it will not print a final copy (last print, May 4th, 2012). Thanks for your assistance with this new world contribution.JARacino (talk) 18:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)JARacinoReply

Welcome! edit

Hello, JARacino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:11, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

Hello, JARacino. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 20:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

Teahouse logo
Hello! JARacino, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

Hello, JARacino. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 22:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nolelover Talk·Contribs 22:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

Community integration, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

πr2 (tc) 19:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

Hello, JARacino. You have new messages at WP:AFCHD.
Message added 23:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055talk 23:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation: Supported Living edit

(transferred from User talk: Salamurai)

Hello: I see you have been on the supportive living page, and my contribution from earlier today has been erased. Any idea what happened to it? You are the only name entering after on my watchlist. Thanks. I think I saw some discussion on it..I didn't place any of my books on, but I have 3 including "Housing, support and community" (1993) from work nationwide in the US.````Julie Ann Racino — Preceding unsigned comment added by JARacino (talkcontribs) 01:27, May 10, 2012‎ (UTC)

Your changes caused the article to appear on the list Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting which I was working on at the time. The article Supported living specifically states that it refers to a term used in the United Kingdom. It appears that your changes discussed US conditions without noting anything about why they would be in article or differentiating about UK/US. Since you are saying you may have included or discussed works by yourself on the page, I refer you to this policy: Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide (more detailed: Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). Please keep in mind anyone can edit anything on Wikipedia for any reason and also have those changes reverted or removed.
Also, if you have messages for editors they should be placed on the Talk page, not the user's page. Thanks. - Salamurai (talk) 17:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


Salamurai: This message was on my site today, June 30, 2014. Supportive living began in the US, including in my state of New York, in the 1970s, as a new model for more capable individuals with intellectual disabilities [I operated an older apartment cluster model, first in the state in the 1970s]. What is called supportive living today (2014) predates that model and goes to the inception of early community group homes and apartments, and even supports to families at home. The UK model and US model which popularizes and academically researched supportive living was a totally new approach (choice of where and with whom to live) challenging the agency stance on organizational models it owned and directed. Both are patentedly different models of services (US and UK) and indeed the early international book on supportive living exited separate from the founders in both countries [different academic group, near university policy]. My 1980s subcontractor (University of Illinois-Chicago, now University of Colorado) is keeping the US stats yet today, and is having trouble (glossed over the support area) due to the merging (mushing) of the category back to all kinds of community living including campuses. It's great - indicates that 90% institutional to community conversion (small size) can occur in "committed states"!! JARacino (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk)Reply

May 2012 edit

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles, such as the edit you made to Supported living. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Also please note that indenting the start of a paragraph does not work on Wikipedia, instead it ruins the formatting of the paragraph. Jac16888 Talk 19:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you...I do seemed to have messed up the pages and they looked just great!! I was just making a few minor edits/additions. JARacino (talk) 04:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)JARacino I'm back online today, and indeed the histories are wonderful to keep track and get back in touch with commentators. JARacino (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Family Support edit

Family Support, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Psycholinguistics edit

Do you have sources about psycholinguistics?

WeijiBaikeBianji: I just came back on, and my two suggested references are listed below.Facilitated communication involves a class of articles often found in autism, popular with the public at this time (2015); first author was Dean of School of Education, Syracuse University. Other is one I identified for your use on gender and psycholinguistics. By the way, my new book is Public Administration and Disability: Community Services Administration in the US(Racino, 2014). Enjoyed your entries and article very much.

JARacino (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I see some controversial claims made in your latest edits and recategorizations of the article Psycholinguistics, and I wonder if you could kindly let us know on the article talk page what sources you have consulted for those statements, which I reverted, assuming your good faith. See you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:02, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

WeijiBaikeBianji: I inadvertently linked to your page as I was working because our community programs are sometimes shy on language translations including American sign language (which keeps exiting at universities like Gaulladet to Nora Groce for public sign language). Our Schools of Education also have speech therapists and language disorders, and a newer facilitated communication for people who are considered to have had no language in institutions to communities(see, wiki on Douglas Biklen) who was dean at Syracuse University. I also have gender and disability "through the gazoo" with a social sciences department at the University of Iceland with Chair Rannveig Traustadottir, from special education roots; I am also Cornell liberal arts psychology and premedicine, clinical psychology and rehabilitation medicine, to national disability and community services administration. I'm on mental health professionals today, and just updated supported housing, family support, supportive living,etc...the latter just added in 2012. Nice to meet you. JARacino (talk) 12:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk)Reply

My internet has a good gender and psycholinguistics: Van Berkuum, ISA (1996). The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: Studies in comprehension and reproduction. Doctoral Dissertation. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands: Nijmegen University Press. [new to me, but will allow gender discussion cross fields; I cite hu'man'].

Biklen, D., Morton, M.W., Saha, S.N., Duncan, J.,Gold, D., Hardadottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). "I amn not a utistivc on thje typ" (I'm not autistic on the typewriter). "Disability, Handicap and Society", 6(3): 161-180. [facilitated communication]

I'd simply reference in list sign language as minority language, too, when analyzing across countries. I have not written, but minority language with proposal for universal (to minority usage). Popular was: Groce, N. (1985). "Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness in Martha's Vineyard". Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Presentation at Syracuse University, 1985]

2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 18:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)JARacino2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 18:36, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

American Mental Health Professional missing from Wikipedia edit

Dear DPL Bot: The community professional workforce needs to go on in entireity, so I did add a few of the last decade personnel such as dual inclusion educators, and mental health professionals which began 1970s new community agencies in the US. The main category is to be the Direct Professional Support Workforce, among others.

JARacino (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mental health professional, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counselors. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DPL: Thanks for the message. Most of the community programs (family support, supportive living, supported housing, psychiatric, psychiatric rehabilitation counselors, mental health counselors, social and human services managers), and personnel seem to be missing, in addition to not being linked to existing pages. They are transferring my community programs to health management (institutional through behavioral and addictions, institutional facility management termed "health managers")and I'm trying to link both groups on.JARacino (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

[User:DPL bot]I will change counselors to mental health counselors which is on your sites. 2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)JARacino2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Checked - Counselors is differentiated from mental health residential counselors, with the former including the latter. 2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 17:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)JARacino2604:6000:A441:BB01:E9DE:9377:D058:91F5 (talk) 17:50, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Community Services, Community Rehabilitation, and Community Support edit

Thank you. Community Integration was the new category that was added, and Community Services, Community Support Services, Community Inclusion, and/or Community Rehabilitation were not on when I last checked the sites. JARacino (talk) 20:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Supported employment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Integration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:DPL botI trust you mean that wiki does not have the proper entry yet, and I need to either modify the entry from integration to community integration, which is already on by me; the normalization group apparently did not add integration and left that for me as well to do. JARacino (talk) 14:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 14:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Could use assistance and comments on the American Mental Health Professional, which has mainly specialists, and not the generic educated personnel which was the approved approach in most of education...now dual system with schools not reporting their structures or use for children, and different service systems for adults===I did add Psychiatric Rehabilitation Counselor which is being prepared at "national Presidential" levels, and also Inclusion Educators and aides (entire Schools of Education) which have mixed training in psychiatric but are high paid and dual licensed in different states. Also, the highest Social Worker to the Executive, and now to be Executives are still at the lowly $40,000 or so on this chart as a doctor (PhD); and the class is often the central health care case manager. Also, technical support yet on the chart. Now big push on behavioral and addictions specialists coming in at high pay without managerial in. JARacino (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 12:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Long Term Services and Supports edit

The 20 pages on the Long-term services and supports were deleted from the "Nursing home" pages, and will be entered, created elsewhere.

JARacino (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nursing home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Talkback edit

Hello, JARacino. You have new messages at Randykitty's talk page.
Message added 19:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Randykitty (talk) 19:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Randy: Left messages on yourpage, jytdog, beetlebox and JamesDoc. Are we forming a new working group near long term services and supports (LTSS) and disability? Apologies.. a bunch of community deletions. I was trying to add 12 national research centers, and 120 year research be starting with a few categories.24.59.153.150 (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)JARacino24.59.153.150 (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Group Home to Residential Services edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Group home, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Normalization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Group home and nursing home were the two on for the public. Other options for familiies, or modernized supported living, and so forth were not on when I arrived at wiki in 2013. JARacino (talk) 19:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 19:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

COI issues edit

You removed discussion of potential COI issues from your Talk page, but you had not yet clearly described the external relationships you have, that would be relevant to a COI discussion. I look forward to hearing a simple and direct answer on that. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:18, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jytog: I can view the tbi comments of James from here (and I checked his site and he is the medical group), but there is not spot I see to respond to him per edited item. In relationship to conflict of interest, I have no current paid conflict of interest with any party which is what I remember COI being in your world about 40 years ago; prior subcontractors (paid federal money exchanges) who are still involved are Braddock (State of the State in the US), 40 year data collection on web; Charlie Lakin of University of Minnesota whose prior staff (Larson, Hewitt, Blakeway, and Sedelzky) are now funded by the US Centers for Medicaid and Medicare; and Arc-US, then Alan Abeson (now Peter Berns, whom I do not know but is appearing on my facebook). JARacino (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)JARacinoJARacino (talk) 19:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I am asking only about the person using this account. You are talking about many people. In Wikipedia, an account is supposed to be used by only one person. Are you a single person or is a group of people using this account? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015 edit

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for an apparent inability to communicate clearly or to understand Wikipedia's basic rules. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 20:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JARacino (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

community services administration block

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon::==( o ) 23:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, I fixed that for you, but I can't imagine a reviewing admin approving it because you haven't actually supplied any sort of reason for lifting the block. This is the sort of thing that led to you being blocked in the first place. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Beeblebrox: I am supposed to be applying for administrator privileges, not having you block my site through your applying first to be an administrator. JARacino (talk) 23:41, 19 May 2015

Draft:Steven J. Taylor concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steven J. Taylor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Steven J. Taylor edit

 

Hello, JARacino. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Steven J. Taylor".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 04:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

JARacino (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18940 was submitted on Aug 11, 2017 22:01:19. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply