So I can't even edit my user page. It is encouraging to know that the reasons I was banned, the two, are mostly reversed. There were two reasons. I editted one page that was woke, and then I editted another page that was dangerously woke. The dangerously woke one has been logged and noted as dangerously woke and in error, and the record stands now for all time of the corrupt interests spinning that dangerous narrative. The less dangerous woke thing that I tried to edit (by the way me being on the side of reality and truth) persists. Because it is less dangerous seemingly I suppose people care less.
Just to be clear. They tried to come up with a new agenda for a deceased terrorist. An anti government murderer was being said to be right wing, when actually, he was very specific in just being anti government. That has now been reversed, and the truth has prevailed. No longer is a tradegy of the past being used for a modern political cause. ALthough the spirit of the indoctrinators will persist, so be careful for future alterations.
The other one was related to a perverted form of narcissism that exists. A famous person insists on being called a certain way, and wikipedia for some reason is catering to this famous person in referring to them in this factually incorrect way.
Oh well. J-E-N-O-V-A (talk) 17:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently I am not here to build an encyclopedia and have been blocked from editing. It is sad because if you go through my contributions, some have persisted for years and have likely been read by tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of people. Granted I did not make large or noticeable contributions and some of my edits were erroneous, the ones that stuck have stuck and have been important. Wikipedia has been a steady force in my life that has helped me grow in maturity as an editor and knowledge as a person. I just hope that moderators in the future can observe the political climates and enforce strict neutrality over then-controversial topics, allowing truth to emerge once the conflict has resolved and calmed.
BEWARE THE CORPORATIONS.
BEWARE ADVERTISING DISGUISED AS CITATION.
THE WORLD IS YOURS. NOT THEIRS.
J-E-N-O-V-A (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, J-E-N-O-V-A, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! – Gilliam (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
May 2022 edit
Your recent editing history at Oklahoma City bombing shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Greyjoy talk 03:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
September 2022 edit
Hello, I'm Felida97. An edit you recently made to Helen Mirren seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster talk 17:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
J-E-N-O-V-A (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
-or is a male suffix, -ess is the female equivalent. it derives from a gendered language that is an ancestor of english. language changes organically, not to fit suicidal political agendasJ-E-N-O-V-A (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's clear from examining your edits and this request that the reason for the block is correct. 331dot (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
bruh, i win the wiki battles. they are important. you have attmpted to neutralise a tech priest (upholding truth and virtue) in support and defence of tech vermin (the forces of chaos) -----