Itzceltic1999
Joined 14 May 2024
Latest comment: 27 days ago by Itzceltic1999 in topic Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 15)
| This is Itzceltic1999's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Itzceltic1999, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Getting started
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 14)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itzceltic1999/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Itzceltic1999!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 15)
edit Please read the previous reviewer's comments; these issues were not addressed before the draft was resubmitted. Let me know if you have any questions! (please 
mention me on reply; thanks!)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
mention me on reply; thanks!)- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itzceltic1999/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @TechnoSquirrel69
- I added as much references as I can. We are currently in UAE Second Division. Still lacks a bit of coverage. So can you kindly help me understand the following in simple words :
- "In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject" Here is the official link that shows we are currently in UAE 2nd Division - https://www.uaefa.ae/en/club/526
- Itzceltic1999 (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sure! The most important issue here is that the article needs to demonstrate the team's notability — a measure of how "important" the subject is and whether or not it deserves its own Wikipedia article. Notability can be shown by providing sources that cover the team in depth, not just superficial coverage or passing mentions in unrelated works. The sources themselves have to be secondary (such as a news article or book, interviews or social media posts don't count), published by a reputable organization (so we can assume the information provided is reliable), and independent (as sources affiliated with the subject in some way may report with biases). Please click on the links reviewers have provided in their messages and read through the relevant guidelines, which will give you more detail on these concepts and relevant examples of reliable sources in action. Let me know if you have any other questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Alright got them!
- https://www.filgoal.com/articles/461460
- https://www.yallakora.com//friendly-matches-club/2541/news/444619/%d8%b9%d8%b2%d9%8a%d9%85%d8%a9-%d9%85%d8%b5%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d8%aa%d8%b1%d8%b3%d9%85-%d8%b7%d8%b1%d9%8a%d9%82-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%86%d8%ac%d8%a7%d8%ad-%d8%ad%d9%83%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d9%86%d8%a7%d8%af%d9%8a-%d8%b1%d9%88%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%84-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b7%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%ad-%d9%84%d9%83%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%a8%d8%a9-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%aa%d8%a7%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%ae-%d9%81%d9%8a-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%a5%d9%85%d8%a7%d8%b1%d8%a7%d8%aa
- https://www.albayan.ae/sports/emirates/2023-05-02-1.4656393 Itzceltic1999 (talk) 06:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sure! The most important issue here is that the article needs to demonstrate the team's notability — a measure of how "important" the subject is and whether or not it deserves its own Wikipedia article. Notability can be shown by providing sources that cover the team in depth, not just superficial coverage or passing mentions in unrelated works. The sources themselves have to be secondary (such as a news article or book, interviews or social media posts don't count), published by a reputable organization (so we can assume the information provided is reliable), and independent (as sources affiliated with the subject in some way may report with biases). Please click on the links reviewers have provided in their messages and read through the relevant guidelines, which will give you more detail on these concepts and relevant examples of reliable sources in action. Let me know if you have any other questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itzceltic1999/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- @DoubleGrazing I have attached the official links, I dont have more reliable sources than what I have provided. Itzceltic1999 (talk) 08:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. In that case this club is clearly not notable enough to warrant inclusion at this time. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)
edit - If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itzceltic1999/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.