Peter Bush edit

When somebody else has written a Wikipedia article about you, you may be considered notable, but not until then. . . Mean as custard (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

March 2013 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Port Talbot, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Port Talbot. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JohnInDC (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please stop adding Peter Bush (presumably yourself) to the Port Talbot article. That particular Peter Bush does not appear to be notable by Wikipedia standards and as such has no place in the article. If you keep this up you will soon find yourself blocked. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mean as custard (talk) 21:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Minor update and some sincere advice edit

Yet another editor has removed Peter Bush from the Port Talbot page. Please, please resist the urge on the strength of Lugia's action to restore him again. Let a few comments accrue at WP:EAR and see how it plays out. I've stated my case there and am not going to resist whatever consensus emerges. As for you - even if you're right, and even if you are finding some support, you want to avoid engaging in what's called an edit war. There's little tolerance for those, even when one of the parties is in the right. Please, for the time being, let the article alone and let the dust settle. (I hope you accept this as sincere advice, and not just a ploy to get my way. I am confident that other editors would agree, that it's time for both you and me to back off of this for a little bit.) Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Belated welcome and orientation message edit

A belated welcome to you! Here are some basic guidelines and orientation to the Wikipedia editor community. Reify-tech (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello Ittfellow and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Reify-tech (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deleting talk page comments edit

If you do this again, I may well decide to block you. SpinningSpark 17:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply