Iowastate

how many mistakes are on this page.

I have serious doubts regarding the veracity of this page. citing Christian sources to support an article about Jesus seem rather one sided.

if you were to cite sources who did not have a vested agenda in proving the historicity of Jesus it would lend some credence.

  I believe you will find that genuine researches have found there to be no evidence to support the claim that 

Jesus was a real person. http://www.nobeliefs.com/exist.htm http://www.stellarhousepublishing.com/jesusmyth.html http://jdstone.org/cr/files/nohistoricalevidenceofjesus.html

I will not endeavor to alter your page on my own I have Christian family and friends and respect their views and realize that faith very often will not recognize facts nor change because of contrary evidence.

President Obama is NOT the first African American President he is the first mixed race president and the first president with an African father.

Michelle Obama is the first African American First Lady.

while not extremely important is sets the tone of not worrying about being accurate.

¬¬¬¬Jim McBride aka iowastate, also the father of a mixed race child which is why this is rather important to me¬¬¬¬

B.C.E.

all articles in Wikipedia should reference BCE as in Before Common Era rather than BC as in Before Christ since this site is used by the entire world and Christians are a minority religion in the world.

by force of common usage turned into tradition most of the world is forced to use the Christian dating system rather than their own systems, why insult everyone further by continually making reference to a god they do not worship or believe in.

it takes very little effort to make an historical date of BCE rather than BC and it does show that we are a universal site and not run by christians which is the implication of BC

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Iowastate/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia /tlk 14:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Iowastate, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wia /tlk 14:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Iowastate/sandbox

Hello, Iowastate. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)