Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Blood Bowl Sutra edit

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Invokingvajras, thanks for creating Blood Bowl Sutra!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please use footnotes to indicate which sources are used to support a statement. For example: what follows "It is said that at one time " should be attributed to a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 10:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm DanielRigal. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Nazism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read the FAQ on Talk:Nazism to understand why your edit was incorrect and inappropriate. We get a lot of people who have been confused into thinking that Nazism is a type of Socialism. It isn't and the people who are telling you otherwise are either completely ignorant about the subject or (more likely) deliberately trying to mislead you. This has been discussed many, many, many times before over on Talk:Nazism. DanielRigal (talk) 19:00, 27 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sundari without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sam Sailor 06:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Varuna, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deva and Soma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Anantacaritra) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Anantacaritra.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Anantacaritra.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Kasa Jizō) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Kasa Jizō.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs some sources, but good work :)

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Gaioa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Gaioa (T C L) 07:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Asuras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 30 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andhaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Devas
List of Asuras (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Deva

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of Garudas moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, List of Garudas, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:23, 1 May 2019 (UT

Hi Inovkingvajras, greetings. Pls note that stand alone lists do required independent, reliable sources to support the content claimed just like any other articles - see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

List of Apsaras moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, List of Apsaras, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Vaitarna River (mythological) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Japanese, Vietnamese and Korean
Rohini (Buddha's disciple) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kapilavastu

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your article 白雲寺 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page 白雲寺 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  04:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello. The addition of the page to English Wikipedia was intentional. I took inspiration from the page 南禪寺, as well as others under Category:Disambiguation pages with Chinese character titles to begin creating disambiguation pages for Buddhist temples in East Asia that bear the same name. Since the pronunciation; and in some cases, variants of Chinese character; of these names differ among regions, it would seem to make more sense using the Chinese characters than to romanize one language among many possible variants.
The English title "Baiyun Temple" refers specifically to the Chinese variant of this name, suggesting those temples which only belong to Chinese speaking populations, which is not as encompassing as their East Asian language pages due to untranslatable writing conventions. If English disambiguation pages are titled using CJKV characters, users can access pages with temples of the same name across countries. This is how the disambiguation pages function in their Mandarin and Japanese counterparts (and Korean and Vietnamese in some cases), which would also make it much easier to link English Wikipedia pages to their international variants. - Invokingvajras 04:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yogācāra edit

 Template:Yogācāra has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuji-in, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Confucius Peace Prize recipients has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Confucius Peace Prize recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Confucius Peace Prize has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Confucius Peace Prize, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:20, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Traditional Korean philosophy edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Traditional Korean philosophy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 29 edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ucchusma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chinese and Japanese
Basic goodness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tibetan language
Vejjavatapada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Raison d'être
Śrāvaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nanda

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vejjavatapada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raison d'être (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Summer kigo edit

 

Categories Category:Summer kigo, Category:Autumn kigo, Category:Spring kigo have been nominated for deletion. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. —⁠andrybak (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 22 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of kigo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Spring and Mutsuki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Dobos torte for you! edit

  7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 14:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhism in Hangzhou edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhism in Hangzhou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:11, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Garudas has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Garudas, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) 04:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist families edit

You are making significant contribution to Buddhism. Please, also contribute to Category:Buddhist families. - Sandesh Tupsundre (talk) 19:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Missing Buddhist topics edit

Excellent, and thank you.
P.S. Be sure to check spelling (e.g. boddhisatvabodhisattva) 👍 --Invokingvajras (talk) 18:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 20 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pancasikha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Lakshmi (Buddhism)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lakshmi (Buddhism). Since you had some involvement with the Lakshmi (Buddhism) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 27 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mibu-dera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Important Cultural Property (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Discrete mathematics edit

I disagree that Category:Discrete mathematics should be in Category:Integers. I'm not sure where the discussion should be, but please ping me if you think of a place. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Buddhism stubs edit

Did you still want to create the Buddhism stub templates that you proposed at WP Stub sorting? You're more than welcome to. Cheers. Liveste (talkedits) 02:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norse demons edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Norse demons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Moe attributes has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Moe attributes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 00:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Japanese name for Vasudhara edit

I see that you added a Japanese rendering of Vasudhara back in March.

Curious where you got the Jisei bosatsu reading for the 持世菩薩 spelling. The only relevant entry I can find in my Japanese dictionaries is this entry at Weblio about 持世経, but indicating a reading of Jise without the additional i. Googling about, I find that the じせ rendering appears to be much more common in the Buddhist context. Compare "持世菩薩" "じせいぼさつ" "は" -amazon -rakuten -wiki and "持世菩薩" "じせぼさつ" "は" -amazon -rakuten -wiki. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good call! I can't recall where I found the reading listed, but it does seem like じせ is more common. Please feel free to edit the article if you wish. --Invokingvajrastalk 22:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Kim Hyong-uk edit

Do you have a source for Kim Hyong-uk being a Buddhist please? NPalgan2 (talk) 19:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

https://febrick.tistory.com/101. Also stated on the Korean wiki, which suggests this to be accurate since I cannot find information that refutes it. --Invokingvajras(talk) 20:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia (even another language wiki) can't be used as a source for Wikipedia. WP:CIRCULAR And https://febrick.tistory.com/101 doesn't look like a reliable source. Were you using the Korean Wikipedia as the source for the other Buddhist tags you've added to the English Wikipedia? NPalgan2 (talk) 21:42, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I was primarily mirroring the information from the Korean articles, in regards to contemporary personalities. List of Korean Buddhists provides a few names as well, but the source link seems to be broken. I'll be sifting through these articles in the relevant language and requesting that sources be provided. Time will tell what errors can be clarified. --Invokingvajras(talk) 22:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Great. Just remember WP:V NPalgan2 (talk) 23:49, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Stock characters in moe culture has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Stock characters in moe culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 03:21, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Contact me edit

Hello Daniel, I'd be really interested in speaking with you in regards to shared interests in certain subjects. Please feel free to email me justin.lowry.42@gmail.com Justin--1128811 (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello justin, i am new on wikipedia. Has he contacted you? Ts dzen (talk) 00:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 28 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Astraeus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stilbon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist communities of Thailand has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Buddhist communities of Thailand, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 01:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Thai Buddhist monarchs has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Thai Buddhist monarchs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:List of Garudas concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Garudas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:List of Apsaras concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Apsaras, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:37, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category work edit

Hello,

Thank you for your work on Wikipedia. However, please do not remove a category from lots of pages and then post an empty category tag on the now empty category so that it is marked for deletion. This is called "emptying categories out of process" and will be reversed.

If you believe that a category should be deleted or renamed, propose it for deletion at CfD and make your argument there. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wilco. --Invokingvajras 2:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing.
As you had got so far with moving Category:Horses in culture and religion to Category:Horses in culture, I finished it off by moving the page, overwriting your new page. But please don't do it like that again. Your work on its own would have lost the history of the category, the talk page, and the interwiki links to other-language Wikipedias.
Also, even if you have a good idea for renaming a category, quite often in discussion an even better idea comes out. Moreover, all we have to do is discuss it; a bot then gets commanded to do the hard work of moving the category page and all its members. – Fayenatic London 20:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Horses and humans edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Horses and humans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Fayenatic London 20:14, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hri (Buddhism), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Śakra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Judaism and atheism edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Judaism and atheism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Judaism and atheism has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Judaism and atheism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 20:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist scientists has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Buddhist scientists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Philadelphia Buddhist Association moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Philadelphia Buddhist Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian Buddhist scholars edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian Buddhist scholars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Indian hermits edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Indian hermits requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khakkhara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baiyun Mountain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist scholars by nationality has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Buddhist scholars by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 22:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Judaism in culture edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Judaism in culture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Hop Gar" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hop Gar. Since you had some involvement with the Hop Gar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. buidhe 19:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks! edit

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wat Wimuttayaram moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Wat Wimuttayaram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Changes to non-existant categories edit

Please cleanup some of the cases where you have changed to non-existant categories. Looking at your contributions, this includes Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 1100s, +Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 935, and a few X-th century Taoist temples.Naraht (talk) 14:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Still one missing one at Chiriku_Hachiman_Shrine. Thanx for fixing the others and all of the work you have done.Naraht (talk) 13:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Just to add to this - the rules on red links to categories are different to red links to articles. In short - WP:REDNOT says that you should either create the category, or not add a category if it's a red link. If you did so with eg Category:Islamic organizations established in 1912 you would have tried to create Category:1912 in Islam and found that it had already been deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_May_7#Years_in_Islam. Now you've just created a whole lot of unnecessary work for both yourself and whoever has to waste time cleaning up your mess.
Also if you find that when you create something like Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in 994 and it comes up with a ton of red linked categories - it's probably a good hint that you're going against the consensus for creating a category in a particular form. For instance, in general we don't create specific year categories for things like buildings before 1000AD - and even up to 1500AD we only do so for the most general kinds of buildings, or categorise by decade rather than year. Beware WP:OVERCATEGORIZATION - a good category has 30-200 members, not just one or two.Le Deluge (talk) 17:59, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seabrook Buddhist Temple edit

 

The article Seabrook Buddhist Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think this particular temple to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 10:14, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 9 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Woo Ju Memorial Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:35, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Religious buildings and structures completed in the 1100s requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Gartak (martial art)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gartak (martial art). Since you had some involvement with the Gartak (martial art) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Linh Thứu Temple moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Linh Thứu Temple, does not have enough sources and citations as written to show notability . It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 00:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhist temples in Idaho edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhist temples in Idaho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:08, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Spiders in culture has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Spiders in culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 23:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhism in Idaho edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhism in Idaho requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:55, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Inari temples edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Inari temples requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Plants and religion edit

I have proposed merging or overwriting of some categories recently created by yourself. Please see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_27#Trees_in_religion. – Fayenatic London 22:02, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linh Thứu Temple (December 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Invokingvajras! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:53, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm Flix11. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shin Tae-yong, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 02:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhist organizations in South America edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhist organizations in South America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:49, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

. edit

email me: love.is.the.truth.777@gmail.com

see you soon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.0.219 (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Saigyō has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Saigyō, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Judicial deities edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Judicial deities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Foremost disciples has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Foremost disciples, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 06:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mythological vertebrates edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mythological vertebrates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:List of Garudas concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Garudas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:List of Apsaras concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Apsaras, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Philadelphia Buddhist Association concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Philadelphia Buddhist Association, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Garudas edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Garudas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Wat Wimuttayaram concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wat Wimuttayaram, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist magazine stubs has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Buddhist magazine stubs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Children of Prince Shōtoku has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Children of Prince Shōtoku has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Boise Dharma Center concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Boise Dharma Center, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Linh Thứu Temple concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Linh Thứu Temple, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Wat Wimuttayaram edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wat Wimuttayaram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Boise Dharma Center edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boise Dharma Center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Linh Thứu Temple edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Linh Thứu Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Philadelphia Buddhist Association edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philadelphia Buddhist Association".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jewish organizations established in 1988 edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish organizations established in 1988 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Apsaras edit

 

Hello, Invokingvajras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Apsaras".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Synagogues completed in 2019 edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Synagogues completed in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 01:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Tomiko Van has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Tomiko Van has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Thina" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Thina. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 27#Thina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 12:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian Buddhist scholars edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian Buddhist scholars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mazu temples in Penghu edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mazu temples in Penghu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of religion by location edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:History of religion by location requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Drikung Kagyu tulkus edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Drikung Kagyu tulkus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhism in culture has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Buddhism in culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sarvāstivāda theory edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sarvāstivāda theory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hindu terminology edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Hindu terminology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Pratyekabuddhas has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Pratyekabuddhas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist texts by genre has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Buddhist texts by genre has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:38, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jonang Buddhists edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jonang Buddhists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hindu artists has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Hindu artists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defunct Buddhist organizations edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Defunct Buddhist organizations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 14:10, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hinduism in culture has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Hinduism in culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jonang texts has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Jonang texts has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shambhala Publications has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Shambhala Publications has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shambhala monasteries and temples has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Shambhala monasteries and temples has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Shambhala lineage has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Shambhala lineage has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:49, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Qing dynasty diplomacy edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Qing dynasty diplomacy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhists by occupation has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Buddhists by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hindu acharyas has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Hindu acharyas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain nuns by nationality edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain nuns by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jain studies has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Jain studies has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Jainism in culture has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Jainism in culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Hinduism and atheism has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Hinduism and atheism has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tamil mythology in popular culture edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tamil mythology in popular culture indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jain publishing companies edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jain publishing companies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jainism and law edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jainism and law indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jainism and technology edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jainism and technology indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Gemstones in fiction has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Gemstones in fiction has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norse deities in art edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Norse deities in art indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Non-existent categories edit

Hi Invokingvajras, it appears that you frequently add non-existent categories to articles. If you believe these categories should exist, please create them soon after adding them to an article. You can see the steps for this at WP:CREATECAT. If you do not intend to create the category, please avoid adding redlinked categories to articles. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:27, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Vietnamese Buddhist Youth Association.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Vietnamese Buddhist Youth Association.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Asura (fiction) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asura (fiction) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asura (fiction) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 08:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Religious fiction has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Religious fiction has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ucchusma Vajrapala Sutra edit

Can you please explain to me why you list the Ucchusma Vajrapala Sutra as being an unreliable source in the article on Ucchusma? Nezahaulcoyotl (talk) 22:05, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Pārśvanātha has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Pārśvanātha has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Confucian thought has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Confucian thought has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fictional anthropophages has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Fictional anthropophages has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:28, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Wei Jin Southern and Northern Dynasties has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Horses in mythology has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Horses in mythology has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RaidRexx (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Rulers by religion has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Rulers by religion has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Vairocana Buddha has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Vairocana Buddha has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 15:14, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bhaiṣajyaguru Buddha has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Bhaiṣajyaguru Buddha has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 15:15, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Temples of Persephone has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Temples of Persephone has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Yuttadhammo Bhikkhu edit

 

The article Yuttadhammo Bhikkhu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, vanity/spam article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Saikū has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Saikū has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 01:18, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Incidents in the history of Buddhism in Japan has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Incidents in the history of Buddhism in Japan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Category:Foreign Ministers of X on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mythological invertebrates has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Mythological invertebrates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 01:24, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Legendary vertebrates has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Legendary vertebrates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 01:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Buddhist artifacts of China has been nominated for splitting edit

 

Category:Buddhist artifacts of China has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:History of Buddhism in Nanjing has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:History of Buddhism in Nanjing has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:People's Republic of China Tibetan Buddhists has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:People's Republic of China Tibetan Buddhists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhism in Nanjing edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhism in Nanjing indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Age and technology edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:New Age and technology indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mythological creatures has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Mythological creatures has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 23:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Age and science edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:New Age and science indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:New Age and society edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:New Age and society indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 17:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Korean false documents has been nominated for renaming edit

 

Category:Korean false documents has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. toobigtokale (talk) 06:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Japanese false documents has been nominated for merging edit

 

Category:Japanese false documents has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 20:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Maintenance deities has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Maintenance deities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 02:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Beauty goddesses has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Beauty goddesses has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PepperBeast (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jewish organizations established in 1934 edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish organizations established in 1934 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 edit

I'm surprised to see an editor with 25,158 edits and nothing in their block log make an edit like this: directly changing quotes to insert falsehoods. What's your rationale here? AusLondonder (talk) 16:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, I apologize if this was a direct quote I changed, as I have zero intention to change anyone's original words or misrepresent a topic. To clarify: The Nazi symbol in question is called a "hakenkreuz." A "swastika" is a symbol used by religious traditions that have origins in South Asia. To call the Socialist symbol a swastika is an outdated misrepresentation that only further marginalizes and dehumanizes religious and ethnic groups that predate, and have no affinity for, the Nazi Party. - Invokingvajras (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply