Imnotacoolguy

The Roadents

This is not an advertisement and none of my damn articles are advertisements. It also doesn't matter if an article is a stub. I have also added your AFD nomination to the log and fixed it since you did it wrong. Schuym1 (talk) 23:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Don't you curse towards me young man.. The stub was a bunch of useless information.. It should be deleted! It's not notable enough to deserve a wikipedia entry... Imnotacoolguy (talk) 05:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Schuym1 may be perhaps suggesting that he feels it is up to a nominator to first do a diligent search for WP:V sources per WP:AFD and WP:ATF and then tag for improvement rather than deletion. Stubs or no, he has not yet created an article that was unable to be sourced as notable, despite first glances. If an article can be improved, it should be tagged so, as deletion is only a last resort in a much longer process. The appearance of that process being ignored frustrates him. Please forgive his impatience. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

And further, since Schuym1 has thousands of edits to his credit in just the last 4 months, and you have less than 2 dozen since youruser account was created a few days ago, I would ask that you assume good faith in his experience as an editor and in his understanding of notability and sourcing. Thank you. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm only fine with people nominating articles if they do a search first. Schuym1 (talk) 22:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I should also report you because of this edit. Schuym1 (talk) 22:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you do anything else on Wikipedia besides making edits about me and my articles? Schuym1 (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, I am usually able to show my article's notability. I improved The Chestnut Tree easily for instance. All the sources where on the first page of a Google search so now it has 3 sources. If you post on my talk page, I will remove your comments. I do not want to deal with someone that constantly complains about my articles and has nothing to do on Wikipedia besides trying to make me look bad. If you respond to this, I will not reply to you. I am done watching your talk page. Schuym1 (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

If you post something on my talk page about how you hate my articles, I will report you to WP:ANI for harassment. And your chances of not getting in trouble is not good with the edit of yours that I posted above. Schuym1 (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I am very serious about reporting you to WP:ANI. Schuym1 (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:ANI notice

There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Imnotacoolguy about your editing. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

I removed the discussion. I was asked to take it to Wikiquette Alerts which I'm not because it's been to much trouble. Schuym1 (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Um, no Schuym1 didn't. There is a still a discussion there. Nobody has commented but me but it's still ongoing if you want to make a comment, Imnotacoolguy. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

courtesy...

Courtesy is always appreciated and goes a long way toward making wiki a happy place. This essay may be helpful. With so much to be done on Wikipedia, you might consider avoiding Schuym1 articles entirely. You apology is a gracious gesture. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carl Ricco

A tag has been placed on Carl Ricco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Carl Ricco

I have nominated Carl Ricco, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Ricco. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)