Danilo Pantic update edit

I believe you made a mistake when adding to the Danilo Pantic page. I don't know if it was you but you updated it last. 124 goals is incorrect it is in fact 24. Also welcome and happy editing. Cdenniff1. Cdenniff1 (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Noted. Thanks for the amendment. Immback (talk) 16:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

2015–16 Premier League edit

MOS:FLAG says that flags should not be used to represent nationalities instead of words- there's no reason why their nationalities are important to the article. I know lots of other pages have flags, but they are wrong too, according to MOS:FLAG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Noted. Thanks for the amendment. Immback (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

July 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm General Ization. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Samsung, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. General Ization Talk 15:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Noted. Reference is added. Immback (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 12:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sources from the OFFICIAL CHELSEA WEBSITE is added, is it reliable enough? PLEASE READ TWICE BEFORE YOU DELETE THE CONTENT THANK YOU!(talk) 12:55, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of FA Community Shield matches. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 02:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply