Wikipedia

User talk:Ilikepie2221/Archive 11

< User talk:Ilikepie2221
Latest comment: 14 years ago by CambridgeBayWeather in topic Medflight (Canada) and Medflight

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Has the shit hit the fan? - WPOOK update, 05/25/2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Maybe...

We've started the next phase

I was experiencing mental block on the article draft for "outline" and on the outline guideline draft. And this was holding the whole project back. Without these (which are intended to explain the type of lists known as outlines in detail), the danger is higher that a controversy could go the wrong way.

I requested help on them, but there was none forthcoming.

So I went ahead and started us on the next phase of operations without those 2 pages...

Our AWB'ers and I have placed about 1600 notices all over Wikipedia. And the plan is to place several thousand more.

This generated only one complaint, but it was a very vocal one, and attracted a few other detractors who seemed unfamiliar with the concept of hierarchical outlines and their benefits. However, just as many or more editors came to the defense of the OOK, and there was no consensus formed. But, dab is still trying to rally opposition to outlines at the Village Pump. See below...

Administrator noticeboard incident and Village Pump policy discussion

It appears that the banner placed on the talk page of the Outline of Switzerland caught the attention of an editor named Dbachmann who posted a rather forceful message on my talk page, another on WT:WPOOK, another at WP:VPP, and still another at WP:AN!

He went well out of his way to use negative hype to cause a stir.

It appears that Mr. Bachmann doesn't understand the nature of hierarchical outlines and their applications. And though he implied that he has never seen an OOK outline before, he was involved with a discussion on these when they were called "lists of basic topics".

His primary argument is that outlines are content forks of articles, and violate WP:CFORK.

But "topic lists", of which outlines are a type, have been around for almost as long as Wikipedia, and fall under the WP:LISTS and WP:STAND guidelines. They aren't intended as forks, as they are lists, bringing the benefits of lists to the corresponding subjects, such as grouping and navigation.

Someone suggested an MfD, but lists are articles, and are within the jurisdiction of AfD. Only the portal page, which merely lists the outline articles, falls within the scope of the MfD department.

The administrator's noticeboard was considered the wrong venue for the discussion, and the discussion was closed.

But Dab's discussion at the Village Pump is still active. Hopefully level heads will prevail there too.

Now what?

Am I disheartened or deterred? Hell no. I say "full steam ahead!"

But we really need to finish the article draft and the guideline. Otherwise there will continue to be confusion.

Over the next week or two, we'll be posting another 1600 or so notices. It's a good thing we didn't send out 10,000 of them all at once.  :)

The Transhumanist 23:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: Another related thread has popped up at WP:VPR#OoK's expediency. --TT   04:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 29 June 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Medflight (Canada) and Medflight

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The two are different companies and when I added that I also added a source to show it. If you look at this it explains that O'Connor owns and operates Medflight. Now according to that article she had started the company "...by 1991..." and goes on to say "The company runs medevac services in Cambridge Bay, though in the past it has served Yellowknife, Inuvik and various points around the NWT and Nunavut." The MedFlight history page says that company didn't start until 1995 and it is based in Ohio. The Canadian company is a bit older but the US one is probably the larger of the two. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

I just realised that the http://www.americanmedflight.com/company.asp company linked in the edit summary is actually American Medflight which is not the same as the Wikipedia article, Medflight. It appears that the name is used by several companies, see Air Ambulances in the United States. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 16:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ilikepie2221/Archive_11&oldid=1166514852"