YOU MUST VISIT YTMND! edit

.

Re: Hey you edit

Fair use images aren't allowed on userpages or talk pages. In fact, nowhere except articles. — FireFox (talk) 11:07, 03 August '06

He doesn't. — FireFox (talk) 11:09, 03 August '06
I know. — FireFox (talk) 11:10, 03 August '06

Excessive categorization of YTMND edit

Please do not add YTMND to irrelevant categories (Category:Creationism, Category:1990s fads, Category:Internet memes) or duplicate supercategories (Category:Websites, Category:Entertainment websites, Category:Fads, etc.). I would suggest that you review Wikipedia_talk:Categorization for a discussion on this topic. ptkfgs 11:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply


Do not redirect your userpage to an article edit

It makes it less useful.Geni 11:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:Geni, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bearly541 11:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

thats funny, i contact him then he just deletes my message from his talk page and ignores me

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABearly541&diff=67422109&oldid=67421988

this site does have some funny people on it!

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Chuq 11:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

repeated vandalism huh? show me where and i will believe you

You're not a very good troll. Show you where? Sure. How about all of these? -- Chuq 13:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Do not edit user pages of other users edit

Please do not edit the user pages of other users, as you did here with User:JzG. This is considered vandalism. ptkfgs 11:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

i read what vandalism is, and that is not vandalism! so you are wrong, if you still think it is vandalism then dont forget to warn this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AI_love_ytmnd&diff=67422186&oldid=67422144
Dude, at least you kept it out of mainspace. Which is something :-) Just zis Guy you know? 11:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

i guess wikipedia is friends with ebaumsworld

any why was i blocked i didnt do anything after final warning, this site is flawed

admin that deletes stuff that isnt vandalism edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=User:I_love_ytmnd/YOU_MUST_VISIT_YTMND

Proof wikipedia users can vandalise ytmnd userpages without getting warned edit

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AI_love_ytmnd&diff=67422186&oldid=67422144

they also revert on YTMND instead of deleting it, so good edits are lost because they are lazy and dont care for articles on things they are against

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I love ytmnd (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i didnt do any vandalism, what is the point in final warnings if you just get blocked straight after anyway?

Decline reason:

Grow up, stop trolling. You're lucky it's not an indef block. — FireFox (talk) 12:16, 03 August '06


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.