Welcome edit

Hello, Husainzaheer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. Just to let you know, if Tanwir Phool meets the notability guidelines, you should create an article for him (just click the red link). Please don't try to insert the content about him into articles about other people (as you did here).

Here are some other pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! • Anakin (talk) 11:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Haiku in English, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yumegusa (talk) 07:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Haiku do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yumegusa (talk) 07:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of Dr.Shakeelur Rahman edit

 

A tag has been placed on Dr.Shakeelur Rahman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 2 says you, says two 14:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Najmul Hoda, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. PDCook (talk) 19:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Gulshan-e-Sukhan(Garden of Poetry)published in January,1970, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Also, Gulshan-e-Sukhan(Garden of Poetry)published in January,1970 has been moved to Gulshan-e-Sukhan (Garden of Poetry). Happy editing! Hamtechperson 01:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Husainzaheer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Najmul Hoda - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing issues edit

I have trimmed back the external links at Arham-ur-Raahimeen (book) to the more reliable sources. you added some back which i believe are not reliable enough, and i removed them. If you feel i am incorrect, and add them back, i will not revert (i dont believe in edit wars), but I strongly suggest you try to find more reliable sources for this authors works. The articles are currently in poor shape and need help from an expert. i fully acknowledge the problem with building his articles, as he is not written about extensively in english, which we need for our sources. Do you know if he or his books have articles on the Urdu WP? if so, please link them if you know how, that will most definitely help out researchers of this author. If you dont know how to link articles to other languages, post the Urdu name for his articles on their respective talk pages here, and i will link them. we dont need the URL for the pages, just the exact name in Urdu characters. good luck.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much.An Urdu book "Tanwir Phool,shakhs aur sha'ir"(in English "Tanwir Phool,person and poet") has been published from Gulistan-e-Jauhar,Karachi which includes articles by Professor M.Zareef Khan,Professor Dr. Najmul Hoda,Professor Hasnaim kazimi,Professor Dr.Khursheed Khawar Amrohvi,Professor Manzar Ayubi,Dr.Hanif Asadi,Dr.Jameel Azeemabadi,Dr.Hasrat Kasganjvi, Professor Dr. Muhammad Sabir,Professor Zafar Umar Zubairi,Professor Dr.Aziz Ansari,Professor Qaisar Najafi,Khan Rasheed Tarzi and others.Name of this book has been included in "Jama(comprehensive)Urdu Encyclopedia",volume 3,pages 83 and 84,compiled by Justice S.A. Rahman and D.C.Smith,published by Shaikh Ghulam Ali and Sons,Lahore.Moreover,articles of Dr.Nazar Kamrani,Hakim Muhammad Saeed,Professor Afaq Siddiqui,Dr.Anees-ur-Rahman,Dr.Jameel Jalibi and Shafi Aqeel of daily Jang Publications are also available.Mr.Shair Ali Shair,owner of Rang-e-Adab Publications has published 4 issues about the above poet.He also published an issue about another Pakistani poet Rafiuddin Raz.The names of Shair Ali Shair and Rang-e-Adab Publication can be seen so many times under the heading "Reference" in the last, at the following link of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafiuddin_Raz Thanks a lot,again.(Husainzaheer)

Speedy deletion nomination of Najmul Hoda edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Najmul Hoda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ariconte (talk) 22:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dhuwan Dhuwan Chehray for deletion edit

 

The article Dhuwan Dhuwan Chehray is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhuwan Dhuwan Chehray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Zaboor-e-Sukhan(the Psalms of Poetry) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zaboor-e-Sukhan(the Psalms of Poetry) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaboor-e-Sukhan(the Psalms of Poetry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Arham-ur-Raahimeen (book) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arham-ur-Raahimeen (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arham-ur-Raahimeen (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Anwaar-e-Hira for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anwaar-e-Hira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anwaar-e-Hira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dear Mercurywoodrose, please see the citation and references about this book and give me some time to search about other 2 books. Thanks a lot.(Husainzaheer)

Nomination of Qindeel-e-Hira (poems) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Qindeel-e-Hira (poems) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qindeel-e-Hira (poems) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Husainzaheer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tanwir Phool. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Greenbörg (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shakeelur Rahman for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shakeelur Rahman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakeelur Rahman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 10:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Najmul Hoda for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Najmul Hoda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najmul Hoda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 10:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tanwir Phool for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanwir Phool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanwir Phool until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 08:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Husainzaheer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply