Hrishiraj talk

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing

I have reverted your contributions at Kulin Kayastha and at Ghosh. In the former case, you really need to read the recent discussion on the article talk page (and please note that Ruderow was blocked from editing for ignoring it); in the latter case, your edit was unsourced and appeared to be pushing a similar point of view. - Sitush (talk) 04:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Furthermore, since you actually took part in the Kulin Kayastha discussion and have therefore seemingly wilfully ignored them now, I feel bound to inform you of the sanctions that apply to articles such as this. Please take note of the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 04:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions.

First of all, what article u provide about the the origin of kulin kayastha is not fully evidence proof & dont try to teach me about the rules of wikipedia if u continuously edit & try to show your bullyness by propaganding what u believe then this case should be solved under the jurisdiction of court. can you give us a 100% evidence about the origin of kulin kaystha that they were sudras? can you show us some recorded family tree which prove your point of view? if not then we have all the rights to take necessary legal steps for you & by the way about "ghosh" what i have edited i heard it from my grandfather he heard it from his grandfather, so do you want to say that they were lying? the goshes , the boses , the miras & the guhas are all kulin kaystha, at one place you are saying that they are sudras & in another article about bose & guhathakurta it has been written that they are khatriyas ,so its already in a verge of contradiction, so is it not an act of vandalism? you are simply following a single source and disrespecting others as well as disrespecting the verdict of court,if yoy have 100% evidence that prove kulinkaystha sudra then lets take this issue to the court to decide.--Hrishiraj talk (talk) 20:07, 25 July 2012

July 2012

Your recent editing history at Kulin Kayastha shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 20:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ghosh. WikiPuppies! (bark) 20:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits to User:Sitush could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 20:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

In addition, I am not sure what you tried to do in this edit --Tito Dutta ✉ 20:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't sign in articles too as you have done here, sign only in talk page and Wikipeoject discussions --Tito Dutta ✉ 20:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

• Please note that the caste related topics that you are editing are covered by community imposed discretionary sanctions, as you have already been informed. If you continue to indulge in tendentious editing in this area (across any name spaces including but not limited to article, talk, user talk etc), you may be either blocked or topic banned from the area. To avoid any sanctions, please discuss on the article talk pages, form a consensus and then edit. —SpacemanSpiff 04:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

i already tried it but it has not worked because every source been provided by me has been said not fully sourced but the source which is also not fully evidence proof has been accepted so thats why i have to went for this activity, because many people raised questions about the article & no definite answer has been given!still there is no evidential scripted family tree produced which support the theory that kulin kayasthas are sudras, then why not the article has not been changed? if anybody dont have any full probe about the theory then both the theories should be there in the article, because it is already started confusing the readers and forcing us to believe the theory which is not fully evidence proof