November 2009 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Illyrians. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. 19:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: I have contributed to wikipedia and provided the source from a US Government Agency. My content on which I spent time to research had been reversed without any reasonable logic. I am contributing to the article Illyrians, and my intentions are far from disruptive. If anyone has disruptive intentions in this issue that is User:Athenean with his pathetic as well as disruptive comments. However I do want to thank you for making the reversal process clearer. Hpqgoog (talk) 00:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours due to your edit warring. In this future, please pursue dispute resolution rather than repeatedly reverting. If you wish to contest this block, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page.
While I'm here, I want to inform you that all Balkans-related articles are under discretionary sanctions, meaning that uninvolved administrators may impose sanctions on editors who disrupt these articles. I mean this as a mere caution. If you do not edit war in the future, you won't need to be concerned with this. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 13:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpqgoog (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will go through dispute resolution. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Your block will expire in about an hour or so and you haven't provided a reason why it should be lifted early. TNXMan 12:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.