User talk:Horse Eye's Back/Archives/2021/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Community Sanctions Alert
 | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Tagging without discussion
Okay, you've been going through all kinds of articles tagging for {{citation needed}} and other problems. But you have not invested any effort to make an edit summary or discussion on talk pages about the need to fix these problems and what can be done. Per WP:DRIVEBY We request that you come back to all these articles, explain your rationale, and participate in the ensuing discussions. Then when placing new tags, you will use a descriptive edit summary of why you're placing them, and you will open a discussion on the talk page simultaneously so that your rationale is known. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:30, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Elizium23: I will not when placing a tag such as Cn which is self explanatory because I am not required to. Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems is an essay, nothing “per” about it. If you have a question about a specific tag ping me on that article’s talk page, I am always willing to engage in talk page discussion. Who is the “we" by the way? You and who else? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 22:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- did you really just cut and paste this on 11 talk pages [1]? Thats spam and not generally appreciated. Elizium23 (talk) 06:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- I will ask for an explanation each and every time a notability tag is removed with sources being added to the article or the talk page. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- I will also warn you that if this disruptive behavior continues you might lose access to the Catholic Church space, you’re cruising for a topic ban in an area you’ve already disclosed COI in. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Horse Eye's Back, don't ever ping me; stay off my talk page; leave me alone. No personal attacks. Elizium23 (talk) 06:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- You’re literally stalking my edits across wikipedia and on my talk page... What in the world do you mean “leave me alone”? Are you seriously not familiar with WP:HARASSMENT? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Horse Eye's Back, don't ever ping me; stay off my talk page; leave me alone. No personal attacks. Elizium23 (talk) 06:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- did you really just cut and paste this on 11 talk pages [1]? Thats spam and not generally appreciated. Elizium23 (talk) 06:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Your edit war warning on my talk page
I have no issues with your warning per se. But it's clearly double standard that you have only accused me of engaging in edit wars while neglect User:UserXPD's identical actions. HypVol (talk) 09:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @HypVol: Not really identical actions... You’ve been reverted by a number of different users, not just UserXPD. Also did you really just cut and paste this on two user’s talk pages [2]? Thats spam and not generally appreciated. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)