Hindushudra

Regd your edit to Bhagavad Gita: I have no problems if you want to make a point about the varnas (or whatever). Just go ahead and explain in a separate sentence why that makes it more informative. Cribananda 19:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. What you say may be true, but you are missing the point. I was just asking how mentioning Krishna's and Arjuna's varnas makes that sentence more informative. If you can explain that in the article, then it would make more sense. Cribananda 16:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome Hindushudra.

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hindushudra. You have some valid points to be included in Hinduism. Your edits are reverted seeing them as vandal. Your edits have to be coherent with the article. I suggest, you discuss your proposals on talk pages and you could have your proposals accepted by all eidtors.

So goes with Bhagawad Geeta.

Once again welcome, Hindushudra.

swadhyayee 02:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hinduism

Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes For more links, go to the project's navigation template.

--D-Boy 06:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Confusion

I am sorry. I just want to know. Are you are a Brahmin or a Shudra? You say that you were born a Brahmin but "shudra" in your screen name. Anyhow, feel free to contribute to Backward-caste Hindu Saints.
Furthermore, sex is only okay under marriage as discussed in the Gita, and even then a person is not a true devotee if they do it. Maleabroad 15:58, November 29, 2006 (UTC)

Before asking such question you can read my user page. How can you ask someones personal identity? I will complain wiki administrators for personal attack. Hindushudra 18:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Answer from Vishal1976 for post of Hindushudra

Revision as of 18:10, 29 November 2006 (edit) (undo) Hindushudra (Talk | contribs) (Shudra Marathas are also Coolie in Mumbai. Not warriors anymore)

This is your post on Maratha Clan System. This is very disturbing for all Marathas like me . Actualy what do you want to prove ?? Earning bread and butter by doing legal work in their poverty instead off doing bad , illeagal works as sex workers , pimp , selling own mother , sisters , wife for sex and earn bread and butter by Maratha is no good according to your ideology and religion. The poor Marathas can't perform marriages of their childrens and other Hindu ritiuls as Vratbandhan , Munj etc , then have you ever heard that the bhramins of Maharashtra or India have performed this rituals for Marathas at fee off cost in the name of Hindu religion ?? So you first what is going on around your society and what is happned in past between Marathas and other caste of India and then post your ediotic comments which are base on British Educational system and politics backed by RSS and Bhramins in India mostly Maharashtra. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vishal1976 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Read your talk page I have posted my reply Hindushudra 18:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hindu

Please stop moving the Hindu article to Hindu-Shudra. It is considered vandalism. If you continue to vandalize articles, you will be blocked from editing. — goethean ॐ 18:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

First read our Varnas, holy Vedas and Geeta before making comments. Hindushudra 18:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased contributions, feel free to do so after the block expires. Coredesat 19:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Without any warning OR discussion how can you block me? There might be content dispute but I did not do vandlaism. On what basis did u blocked? Hindushudra 09:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

You were immediately blocked for a week because of persistent insertion of content that violated the neutral point of view policy, and performed an unilateral move that also violated that policy. At any rate, you've only been blocked for a week. If you want another admin to review the block and make a decision, post {{unblock|reason}}, replacing "reason" with why you think you should be unblocked. --Coredesat 17:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Who are you

Can you please give me u r introduction? Shudra123 17:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)