HeartCat1

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi HeartCat1! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 22:51, Thursday, January 7, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome!

Hi HeartCat1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for helping to revert vandalism on Wikipedia, HeartCat1! Once you've got 200 edits to mainspace you're welcome to join the counter-vandalism unit academy. Until then, you can ask questions at the teahouse. Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Pahunkat! Thanks for the warm welcome to Wikipedia! I can't wait until I am able to join the counter-vandalism unit academy. I'll be asking many questions on my journey as a Wikipedia contributor. Thanks again! HeartCat1 (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

No problem! You must be having a hard time using undo, once your account becomes over 4 days old you'll be WP:AUTOCONFIRMED and will be able to use more automated gadgets like Twinkle (and I think RedWarn as well, but I'm not sure where the threshold is for that gadget). Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 15:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the information! HeartCat1 (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your work on Address bar — Safety Cap (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Like me you revert vandalism and I've noticed you revert an edit before I'm about to lol, so here's an award to say thanks. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 05:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Re: list of banks in Azerbaijan

Just wanted to let you know that since there were multiple reverts back to back and none of them fixed it, I just manually redid the link Areferencetopeterkropotkins1892booktheconquestofbread (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I just noticed. Thanks! HeartCat1^💬_📝 19:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi HeartCat1,

When you restore disputed material about living people, such as at Emir Suljagić, the burden of verifiability and the onus to obtain a consensus for inclusion is on you. Please also have a look at the section about restoring deleted content of the biographies of living persons policy.

Thanks and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

I think this was borderline condescending toward HeartCat1 (and toward me, for a similar message on my talk). You placed this template, and restored the anon user's edits on the basis of WP:BLPRESTORE, yet you do not seem to have read the policy yourself. This applies only to good faith edits -- and if you look at the page history at Emir Suljagić, you'll see that the IP edit summaries were clearly not NPOV, even accusing editors of racism and slander. You have not once attempted to communicate with the anon user, either. Please tread more carefully when throwing templates at experienced users who are dedicating their time to monitoring such disruptive edits. --Hadal (talk) 22:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, HeartCat1's revert is actually understandable; I had written the message under the incorrect impression that 2001:8F8:173D:E6E5:5D40:EC4C:4C62:4A2C had already complained in their first edit summary. As there was no explanation given in Special:Diff/1152525105, complaining about this lack of an explanation ([1]) was a perfectly fine reaction; interpreting it as vandalism and restoring it without verification (one of the source links is dead) 15 seconds later is debatable but understandable. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Just to be clear, the anon user's edit summaries "complaining" is actually the user accusing other editors of slander and racism. Do you understand that? --Hadal (talk) 22:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

This is unrelated to HeartCat1's contributions, so I have replied on your talk page instead. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello!

I realized later that I should have added an explanation as to why I was restoring the deleted text. Sorry for causing so much confusion! HeartCat1^💬_📝 22:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

No need to apologize: You didn't do anything wrong. ToBeFree was the one who jumped the gun here. You reverted an anon editor who blanked a page section without any explanation. This is a perfectly reasonable action. --Hadal (talk) 22:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi HeartCat1. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2023-06-05. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 00:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		For helping having dealt with the massive vandalism that took place moment ago, I award you the Recent Changes barnstar. Thanks for all that you do! Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 02:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)