HairyHannah

You have massively violated wp:3rr on Janelle Pierzina. Stop now or you will be blocked. Looie496 (talk) 01:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

I've blocked you for 48 hours due to massive revert warring.   jj137 (talk) 01:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked one week for same reason. Neither you or BaldPete have attempted dispute resolution at Talk:Janelle Pierzina. Spellcast (talk) 22:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

As requested by me and Spellcast, please explain your edits on Talk:Janelle Pierzina. BaldPete (talk) 19:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Again, I will have to ask you to explain your edits on Talk:Janelle Pierzina. BaldPete (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

A final request for you to explain your edits on Talk:Janelle Pierzina. BaldPete (talk) 20:44, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 23:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Janelle Pierzina. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -epicAdam^(talk) 05:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

When you return...

...if you continue edit warring at Janelle Pierzina without reaching consensus or even engaging in discussion I will block you indefinitely for repeated violations of the three-revert rule, anonymous sockpuppeting as User:71.200.22.228 to avoid detection of a 3RR violation, a pattern of disruptive editing, expressing ownership of the article, and being a single-purpose account. I strongly recommend that you disengage from editing the Janelle Pierzina article if you cannot participate in the collaborative editing process. If you have any questions, please post them here as I have your talkpage on my watchlist. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Janelle Pierzina has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 05:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Janelle Pierzina and Will Kirby

Please talk to us, even if you are one of the subjects, instead of edit warring. Let us know why you want or object to the changes made. Your actions are extremely unhelpful to the project, and what you are doing is considered disruptive editing. Ohconfucius (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

You have been warned multiple times. Did you really think it would be wise to restart with the exact same arguments after a one-month break? If you want to appeal this block, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block include the fact that you can email if you wish. I hope you come back and become productive but we cannot allow you to just keep doing the same thing until everyone else gives up. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Janelle Pierzina

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Janelle Pierzina. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janelle Pierzina 3. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)