300 Edits

edit

I noticed recently that you changed the 300 article to reflect what might have been the historical number of soldiers in the Persian army, but as the film has been deemed at this time to be fictional, and because the term 1 million was used in the film repeatedly, I think you might want to revert your edit and change it back. If you have concerns about this, we can talk about this on either my Talk page or the article's Discussion page. Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Threats are not tolerated on Wikipedia. If your incivil behavior continues, you will be reported. —Erik (talkcontrib) - 20:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, Erik got here before I did. I was just going to ask you why you were so angry with me. I didn't make the movie, and I didn't make the script say that there were 1 million Persians. Perhaps instead of getting all whiney, you could head out, make a documentary about the great and mighty errors of the film and get a major studio to release it. Otherwise, save the drama for your mama (she says hi, btw). Arcayne (cast a spell) 04:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I see. Perhaps you might want to preface your 'jokes' with a smiley or the neticon 'j/k'. And I wasn't kicking your face in - trust me, you'd be picking up your keyboard keys like chicklets and checking yourself into a English department to reattach your dangling participles. :) Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism to English variant

edit

Please read WP:ENGVAR. You edit to Program is considered vandalism. You are hereby warned that if you repeat this you will be blocked. Dicklyon 22:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Personal attacks

edit

The sort of comments you've made at Talk:Armour, on your userpage, and several other places, are personal attacks and will not be tolerated. Please stop, or you will be blocked. Wikipedia is not the place for nationalism. --Eyrian 01:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--Eyrian 22:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HMSvictory (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been completely unfairly blocked. Americans are truly the most pathetic people in the world. Programme is the correct spelling, and I don't care what you all believe. It was not vandalism, it was improvement, and I would have changed the article titles as well if I'd had the chance

Decline reason:

You have been blocked because you have failed to comply with the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. Your unblock request was both deeply offensive to American readers and also shows that you are not interested in playing by the expected norms. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. Feel free to request and unblock when you have thought this through and if you are prepared to follow the rules. — Spartaz Humbug! 14:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HMSvictory (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Fine then. Block me forever. No one will care, but before you delete my account and hunt me down, just let me say that I did my part for England. I just hope someone understands how idiotic you Americans are. No, it's not a personal attack, it's a plead for justice and honour against you evil people.

Decline reason:

God Bless America. - auburnpilot talk 15:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just so you know I'm English, but unlike you I'm not bigoted nor intolerant. Spartaz Humbug! 15:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am not intolerant, and I highly doubt that you are English. If you are, then you would: a) Understand my position and: b) Use correct grammar and spelling.

I have an undying hate for Americans, they are our obese and ungrateful grandchilderen. You have no idea what they have done to me and my family. And finally: Can you give me an approxiamte time of your breaking and entering into my house to kill me? I'd just like to know, that's all.

Oh dear

edit

I was going to seriously consider your emailed request for unblocking but then I saw [1]. Clearly you have learned nothing. Goodbye. Spartaz Humbug! 09:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply