May 2021 edit

 

Your recent editing history at The Kid Laroi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SK2242 (talk) 03:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GrantEdwards. Thank you. Alex (talk) 19:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of sockpuppetry block edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GrantEdwards. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GrantEdwards (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can you please close this account and open the other account (RallenEsq) which is my real name? Also, I thought that having two accounts for legitimate reasons did not violate terms of service. Thank you. GrantEdwards (talk) 02:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request; if you are no longer going to use this account, simply stop using it; we have no ability to "close" or delete accounts. 331dot (talk) 07:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Kid Laroi, you may be blocked from editing. SK2242 (talk) 04:10, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Kid Laroi. Notfrompedro (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (The Kid Laroi) for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 21:36, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Since you are a paid representative of Laroi, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:GrantEdwards. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=GrantEdwards|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} SK2242 (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GrantEdwards (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have repeatedly posted the truth about Kid Laroi, and have the documents to prove it. I would like to request dispute resolution. Please remove my block and let me know how I can resolve this matter.

Decline reason:

You should not be editing that article if you have a conflict of interest. ST47 (talk) 07:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.