Globjulia

Welcome!

Hello, Globjulia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

While I have your attention - nice job on the al-Rodhan article. Keep up the good work, eh? DS (talk) 15:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Globjulia/Emotional Amoral Egoism has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional Amoral Egoism, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. Petan-Bot (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional Amoral Egoism. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 16:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mangoe (talk) 02:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Searches indicate that there are not enough independent references to this concept to suggest that it is notable. Mangoe (talk) 02:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Human nature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hobbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Fifth Estate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Executive and Weblogs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nayef Al-Rodhan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Antiquity and Power (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Nayef Al-Rodhan article

Hello, I wanted to let you know that I had not arbitrarily removed Dr. Al-Rodhan's first name and title from the article you have been working on. WP:SURNAME explains that on first use, the full name should be used and subsequent uses should just have the last name. I hope this helps make the article better by following the Manual of Style. I also noticed some over capitalization that you might take care of. Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 16:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

International security

I have reverted your extensive additions to the article. They were obviously in good faith, but they created a very unbalanced perspective for readers. The extent of Al-Rodhan's contributions should only be mentioned in proportion to their importance to the topic of international security. (And the significance of these ideas should be verified by reliable sources). --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 07:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

I too redid some of your work on Good Governance, remember Wikipedia isn't a place to promote one scholar's positions, rather we are looking to collect many different source from different locations to provided a Neutral Point of View, Sadads (talk) 14:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Looks like you've been adding large paragraphs of Al-Rodhan's thoughts to Geopolitics, Meaning of life and other general articles. It's inappropriate to give this much weight to a single scholar - the meaning of life article has a general section on "Scientific inquiry and perspectives" that mentions only a few academics by name, and summarises their point of view in a few sentences. You're welcome to mention Al-Rodhan in the same context if his writing is notable, but the article does not need three massive sections for him alone, when Darwin doesn't even get directly namechecked. --McGeddon (talk) 16:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dignity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Environment, Transparency, Attachment, Representation, Opportunity and Participation

National security (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Stability, Environment, Statecraft, Reconciliation, Progress and State power

Physicalism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Deduction, Physical, Temporal, Spatial, Provable and Interpretation

Cultural diversity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Samuel Huntington, Equality, Exclusion and Arrogance

Global justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Transparency, Fairness, Military power and Self-interest

Individualism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Self-interest, Survival and Conflict

Survival of the fittest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Egoism, Ideas and Pre-emptive

Aggression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Survival and Brutality

Power (international relations) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Reconciliation and Housing

Sustainability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Survive and Transnational

Human nature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Environment

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Undue weight to Nayef Al-Rodhan's theories

Hello again. You seem to have been editing several general-subject articles such as Meaning of life and Epistemology to add an entire section on what the Oxford academic Nayef Al-Rodhan thinks about them. These are articles that give a very broad overview of a subject, and where even the viewpoints of leading figures are only mentioned in passing, within the context of a wider paragraph that describes the discipline they belonged to. Specific writers are only examined in relation to the significance of their contribution to the subject, and may not even be directly namechecked.

It is inappropriately undue weight to interrupt this with one or more standalone sections that detail Al-Rodhan's thoughts in great detail. He should either be given the same weight as other philosophers and academics - or, if he's up against Popper, Descarts and Darwin and other heavyweights on the meaning of life, his additional thoughts probably aren't significant enough to the field to merit a mention in a general encyclopaedia entry. I'd recommend focusing on articles about specific subjects where Al-Rodhan has published, recognised expertise, rather than wading in on the meaning-of-life type ones. --McGeddon (talk) 09:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I'd add that if you're in any way connected with Al-Rodhan, or with the promotion of his book, you should familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy before making any further edits related to his work. --McGeddon (talk) 09:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism

Hello Globjulia. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Emotional amoral egoism".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emotional amoral egoism}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Globjulia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nayef Al-Rodhan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nayef Al-Rodhan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayef Al-Rodhan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)