Ways to improve Aidan Keena edit

Hi, I'm Abishe. GlasgowBraveheart, thanks for creating Aidan Keena!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 20:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join Women in Red edit

 
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for January:

Prisoners Fashion designers Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 14:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you + invitation edit

 

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Other Scottish players edit

If you're interested in working on other Scottish players articles, Lee Alexander (footballer) has three caps with the national team and needs an article. Hmlarson (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi sorry Hmlarson, would have loved to start this article but only just saw your message. Please keep me updated with anything that needs startedGlasgowBraveheart (talk) 18:44, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Operation Punishment edit

The Encyclopedia of Codenames of World War II (Routledge_ does not have a Strafe. It has Punishment (German Bestrafung, not Strafgericht) for the bombing of Belgrade only (6–9 April) and it has Projekt 25 for the invasion of Yugoslavia itself, a subdivision of Marita. Interestingly, Detlef Vogel has a paper titled (in part) Operation Strafgericht and Unternehmen 25 is the subject of an unpublished thesis by Franklyn Prieskop. Gerhard Weinberg, Germany and the Soviet Union, cites an OKH document from 30 March 1941 that uses "Unternehmen 25". I could go on, but one Osprey book does not make a case. Your citation for the Hitler quote is still incomplete. Srnec (talk) 01:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

There's a couple of good books on the Nuremburg trials that go into detail about the atrocities of the the bombing of Belgrade and the Yugoslav invasion. If you want to change the info go ahead. I'm not sure but I think Strafegericht (plate of punishment) was a reference to the particularly harsh bombing of Belgrade and I'm not sure where it came from but it rings a bell. I'm sure you'll agree one of Hitler's gifts was propoganda and presentation and he loved giving operations names - britain: lion (changed to sea lion), greece: marita, soviet union: barbarossa - names with significance. I would say it seemed out of character for him to leave the yugoslav invasion as operation 25, especially after they'd internationally embarassed him. I would suggest to at least leave Strafe for the codename with operation 25 if you add it. I actually have a couple of books I've seen quite recently where Strafe is referred to as the codename for fuhrer directive number 25. I'll try and dig them out GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC) ~Ethan Hollander's book "Hegemony and the Holocaust" quote the "pitiless/unmerciful harshness" line from a meeting between the fuhrer and german high command in march 1941. It's a good book, very informative with alot of quotes and referencesGlasgowBraveheart (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Location map edit

Hello! Here we go. NNW (talk) 21:09, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'm in love - thank you NNW GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 21:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
:o) Btw: I have to inform you that I nominated Template:Scotland Central Belt for speedy deletion cos there is no use for it now. NNW (talk) 21:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Fine with me :) Thank you so so so so much NNW GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
What was the problem? Moved some markers, is it better now, or are there positions off I didn't see? -Koppapa (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
hi Koppapa, thanks for your changes. there was a problem getting a smaller, clearer map. I requested a new one from (the amazing) NordNordWest, I then messed up the template... but NNW kindly sorted that out too. So all sorted. Thanks for coming back to me :) GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Twitter etc. edit

We have very clear guidelines, and the links very clearly fail them. We list only one official site. If you disagree please read the guideline and the numerous discussions keeping up that decision on the talkpage of that (or even AN/I for that matter). If you think you have a case, please discuss it there and get consensus. Please stop adding them, they do not belong. —Dirk Beetstra T C 19:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dirk BeetstraI don't understand. please show me a direct link to a guideline where the twitter of a club cannot be added.. It's a direct link to the official clubs twitter and I cannot see anything that states it shouldn't be added. you previously left the club website and the scottish fa links. the scottish fa link only provided info already referenced in the article. I changed that to the twitter which is a far better informative source.

Scottish womens football teams' main source for info is usually twitter: {https://www.jaxmcmedia.co.uk/jax-mc-media-team} -"What tools do you find most helpful for getting scores or news stories? Twitter, FB and the web are the places to go for information. I would say Twitter is the best at covering 80% of the Women & Girl's teams in Scotland." (Jax McManus) GlasgowBraveheart (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is linked from my edit summary. —Dirk Beetstra T C 20:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018 edit

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018


 
Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues
Current season articles needing creation


Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

 

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, GlasgowBraveheart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Stirling University L.F.C. has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Stirling University L.F.C., which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aloneinthewild (talk) 14:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Close paraphrasing on Torbrex Village edit

  Your addition to Torbrex Village has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not post it on any page, even if you plan to fix it later. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MER-C 16:28, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply