Ghee99

ghee99 is one of the best, although infrequent editors (and people in general) in his own opinion.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Barack Obama do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also, WND and Newsmax are not considered reliable sources. Please see WP:RS for further guidance. Loonymonkey (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ghee99. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of "tall actors"

The article "tall actors" has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr.K. logos 05:02, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Van Jones

Why the removal of "(he has since renounced these views)"? Eva Patterson notes the article in question makes this clear, it was about his political transformation from radical to capitalist and renouncement of his past views.--The lorax (talk) 14:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

October 2019

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Katie Hill (politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You're quoting of the Daily Mail, which is depreciated on Wikipedia per WP:DAILYMAIL, in a WP:BLP under WP:1RR restrictions. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

I sourced Daily Mail (its a major newspaper, how am i supposed to know its is 'depreciated'?

Anyway, as soon as I sourced it, it bounced back as not trustworthy enough, so I immediately changed the source to the NY Post (which you all accepted as a valid source).

Not to mention, the fact that i put on her account is something known and well reported all around the world (that there are photos released of her nude, smoking a bong, with an iron cross tattoo).

Seriously? I cant report well established and 100% true things, just because the person is a liberal politician?

C'mon, just lets have facts only on here. No more of you (whoever you are) threatening me with banning just because i reported a 100% but unflattering detail about a liberal politician.

No more bias, thank you!

October 2020

Hello, I'm Super Goku V. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Recliner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. If you do believe that you have a source for the alternate name, "turtle backer", then please reply to this message. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)