Welcome! edit

 
Picture of the day!

Hello, Gertsik, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Happy editing! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The
Adventure
 

Hi Gertsik!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!


This message was delivered by -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Reply

WikiProject Film Invitation edit

 
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (October 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Gertsik, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 11:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Els Vandevorst has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Els Vandevorst. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 04:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (October 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 18:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (November 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 08:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (November 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback edit

 
Hello, Gertsik. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).


AfC notification: Draft:Els Vandevorst has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Els Vandevorst. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (November 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Els Vandevorst has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Els Vandevorst. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (December 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 06:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Els Vandevorst (February 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Els Vandevorst concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Els Vandevorst, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Els Vandevorst edit

  Draft:Els Vandevorst, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Els Vandevorst and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Els Vandevorst during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply