User talk:Geremy.Hebert/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Freeloading

Wikipedia is not a social networking site or free host. You clearly have no intention of contributing to this encyclopedia. Therefore you are, in my view, not entitled to a user page. You may pick up your text via the edit history but please publish it somewhere else. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

• This coming from an individual whose own user page has the first line directing a reader to his own personal website? A user page denoting singularly his accomplishments? Be it wiki or fishing it's MY user page denoting my background documenting my knowledge base regarding editing. When I am done returning my user page to it's original and approved status I will peruse the wiki pages as I so desire on my own terms and schedule. You do not have the authority or privilege to discern what level of contribution removes one from your scope of malcontent.It's a shameful truth of man that one thinks he is better than another, so much so that he is not allowed the same as another. You have a user page and now I have a user page. It has no social networking intentions depicted whatsoever, it is biographical in nature.What a wretched thing you be.Geremy.Hebert (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

The point is that my user page reports my accomplishments on Wikipedia. You have none to report so you are not entitled to a page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

• The same comes from this individual, who is also an administrator here. You are clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia: we are not a webhost, neither for your fishing stories or your rants about humanity, and so I am blocking your account per WP:NOTHERE. Drmies (talk) 23:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 23:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Geremy.Hebert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Ok, after a self imposed cool down period I would like to argue for reinstatement. I now understand what would be considered acceptable. My contribution strengths would be grammatical errors and spelling, subject irrelevant. I was getting back into wikipedia via Random Article and got carried away with my own page and accomplishments outside of wikipedia. I now understand the parameters in which I am constrained and would like to be considered for unblocking. I have made marked contributions many years ago and recently felt inclined and inspired to begin again the communal maintenance of our collective knowledge. Please consider this my candid and heartfelt apology and acknowledgment of those earnest volunteers who put in more effort than I ever did and to have my user page undone to a period before I began editing, somewhere before January. Geremy.Hebert (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Procedural; unblocked by RHaworth. Please be careful to edit within policy, or - as noted below - you may be re-blocked. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 13:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Question: you state "I was getting back into wikipedia [sic]" and "I have made marked contributions many years ago...". Are you stating that you have previously edited Wikipedia using another account? --Kinu ^t/_c 07:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes I've had 3 I believe over a period of a decade perhaps. One I tried namechange but didn't work so abandoned and made this one. I don't even recall my first used to delete spam articles and advertisements.Geremy.Hebert (talk) 09:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Being a cynic, I looked at the removed material, and also at User:Geremysguitar/The Holiday Gift Foundation and both looked to me rather more like adding spam not 'deleting' it - I presume you mean 'tagging' unless you were an administrator in another account. The Geremysguitar account seems to have mainly made its edits to a self-promotional sandbox in 2009, which you requested deletion for recently. I'd be interested to see if you could remember anything more solid in previous contributions. Peridon (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Unblocked

Being as cynical as Peridon, I must say that this contribs history is not very impressive but does agree with your claim. I have decided to see if you can live up to your word and have unblocked you. You can revert your user page to this state yourself. Apart from that, if you write anything at all about yourself until you have a reasonable mainspace contribs history, then I am laible to re-apply the block. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

thank you Geremy.Hebert (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)