User talk:George Ho/Archives/2012/1

Pauline Fowler

Since when have I gone to any trouble to replace File:Wendy Richard Pauline Fowler BBC 2006.jpg with File:Pauline Fowler.jpg? Have you got the right user? TrebleSeven (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Care to elaborate "right user"? I uploaded the 2006 image first and made rationale that treats Pauline Fowler and Wendy Richard as the same. However, I did ask, and I don't know what else to say anymore. I waited, and I was not notified about this. Both images are under review. --George Ho (talk) 22:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

George, have you left TrebleSeven a note about this file? You have the wrong user. See File:Pauline_Fowler.jpg. The chap you want is User:GSorby Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

I have already talked to GSorby. --George Ho (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Look, I have never even heard of Pauline Fowler. You have obviously got the wrong user. Have a look at my edit history if you don't believe me. TrebleSeven (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I believe you; you might have miscommunicated and assumed that I was discussing with you and was referring you as an uploader. Actually, I was talking to GSorby instead of you. That's it. --George Ho (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	[1] Begoon talk 00:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Soap Opera photos

Hi George,

Have added some new photos at Commons:

• File:General Hospital John Beradino 1964.JPG
• File:One Life to Live scene 1972.JPG
• File:One Life to Live Wolek wedding 1977.JPG

The two here are composite photos; I just uploaded them without separating them. If you want to separate, please do, or if you want me to do it, please let me know.

• File:Emily McLaughlin John Beradino General Hospital 1967.JPG
• File:One Life to Live characters 1973.JPG

Thanks, We hope (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Non-free image

A you now know non-free images can be a bit of a minefield. Good luck and keep up the work which can be rather thankless. ww2censor (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete previous versions of this file

Hello George Ho. I was just wondering if you could delete the previous versions of the following file File:Google_maps_screenshot.png? Thanks for the help. TrebleSeven (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Ahem! I'm not an administrator and have no power to do so. Maybe you can wait and be patient until then... --George Ho (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

David Wicks

Hi George, I couldn't help notice that you changed the duration of the David Wicks article to read 2012 only. Now, while we all KNOW that David will be leaving EastEnders in a few days time again, we haven't had any official source to confirm that. Yes, David is only appearing in the spoilers for the next few days, and yes we know that the actor Michael French is continuing to appear in Casualty. But still we have no source. Bleaney (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

We still have no source on his staying either. This is January 2012; we haven't reached December 2012 yet. --George Ho (talk) 19:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Why do this?? Please dont start getting the EE editors backs up as well George, why dont you try to source your edits instead. Bleaney (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Why not you? By the way, I am discussing this in Talk:David Wicks. --George Ho (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

RFC

George - I thought we were going to agree on the RFC question before you created the RFC? Your question seems fine to me, I'd only play with the wording a bit, but that's not important. Hopefully Green Cardamom approves of your question too. Begoon ^talk 22:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

10 Possible AFD Candinates.

Hi George! Ive seen youve sent a shudder through all the soap articles lately! Now, im not an expert at AFD (these could be perfectly fine articles, I just dont know) so this is why ive asked you to have a look into these articles, :)

• Tony Discipline- Only notable for one role (EastEnders), the TV Appearances have all been for EastEnders.  Done
• Sam Marshall.
• Charlotte Adams (Home and Away)
• Lucinda Croft
• Simon Fitzgerald (Home and Away)
• Matt Wilson (Home and Away)

Put a talkback on my talk when you reply!-- MayhemMario 20:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The one youve added to Tony is wrong (I think), the article does have references. The tag at the top says it does. MayhemMario 20:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I've removed the IMDB because it's unreliable and WP:SPS. Also, the content may be also seen in tyler Moon. What do you think? --George Ho (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Literally, the info on Tony is the same (nearly word for word) as Tyler. MayhemMario 20:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

That guy is 22 years old, and EastEnders is his first tv role. We'll wait for his future credentials. --George Ho (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict)I have recently redirected the actor to the fictional character. Any objections? --George Ho (talk) 20:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I do feel that the making of the article was premature, so no objections. What about the others? MayhemMario 20:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

• Damian Roberts
• Lucas Holden
• Henry Hunter (Home and Away) MAJOR!
• Roxanne Miller

-- MayhemMario 20:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Quick comment. There are quite a few sources around for Lucas Holden and he's been on my to-do list for a while. Once I've finished working on my current project, I'll sort him out. Rain might have some book sources for some the other characters. I do know there doesn't appear to be any sources for Damian and the article probably shouldn't have been created in the first place. - JuneGloom Talk 20:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh, Henry Hunter could probably be redirected to one of his parents or the past characters list. I don't think there will be much argument there. - JuneGloom Talk 21:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

George, let all the ones which June mentioned she will be doing above slip for a while, thanks MayhemMario 21:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Georgo HO - there isn't much point in ridding of these. You can see that me and JuneGloom are working on adding sources to Home and Away topics, if some are not notable - which a few are not - they can be redirected to a list no problem. You've nominated Sam Marshall - a regular character in the series for years and actually had big storylines. You claim to have looked for sources for this character in the AFD - but at the same time state he may be a recurring character - when he was a series regular for many years.Rain the 1 21:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Still... ...Anyway, just make a point in that AFD. --George Ho (talk) 21:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

You are being unfair by going around nominating, proding, speedying - You must know by now that both myself and JuneGloom work hard on improving these article. If we say we shall get around to it, why carry on. You do not have much good faith in soap editors.Rain the 1 21:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

How so? I mean... prove that I'm not faithful to soap editors; well, I'm not that unfaithful. Actually, I have no faith on articles that do not have reception and impact sections. Look at Sam Malone and Diane Chambers; I'm working on it. They are not soap opera couple, but they are easier to research because many sources cover it. Look at Nikki Alvarez; I found no significant coverages to determine notability. What do you think? --George Ho (talk) 21:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

"Damien Roberts" is deleted per G4. To be honest, I did not mean to put you under a lot of stress; I don't know what words coming from my heart, but I feel sorry for you. If you want me to contest the deletion with WP:DELREV, then say so; otherwise, let's move on. By the way, look at Ashley Cotton; the article of the one-year character was close to being deleted until somebody added balance from reality. What about Sam Marshall to you? --George Ho (talk) 22:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I didn't come here to talk about those and they have no relation to what to the articles Mario linked. I'm sorry, but I have helped you numerous times - and the next day you nominate something else notable without carrying out a search of sources. I'm all for an AFD providing the subject does not pass WP:GNG. Also, I know it is not your intention to stress anyone out as I know you are trying to sort articles out. All I ask is instead of nominating a bulk in a ten minute period and assess the situation.Rain the 1 22:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry, I won't nominate any other article right now if reality and fiction are balanced, especially after PROD tags are removed. To imply, do you want me to have the deletion discussion of Damien Roberts reviewed in WP:DELREV? I can't remember how you have helped me, but have I let you down or anything like that? --George Ho (talk) 22:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to have to strongly concur with Raintheone. I thought we'd settled this matter, with even one of your mentors weighing in, at WP:SOAPS. It was supposed to have been settled before you were unblocked. Why are you nominating articles like Ethan Cambias for deletion when you can just redirect them to related or list articles? And, yes, biography list articles for fictional characters often don't have to provide notability. Flyer22 (talk) 23:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

There is not much point in a deletion review for Damian because I only wanted it to serve as a redirect.Rain the 1 23:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, to all three of you, I really didnt mean for this to be a big problem. I just gave a list of articles which looked bad to George. Didnt even look for soruces, ect. MayhemMario 16:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Well then, if you could avoid giving George lists of articles that (as is apparent in the conversation) even you don't think should be AfD'd, and asking him if he would AfD them (which he reads as "will you now go and put Afd tags on them"), and do your own nominations based on your own opinion, that would be a helluva lot more helpful. Thanks. Elen of the Roads (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

AFD stats

Hi George. It occurred to me that you might not be aware of the tool ScottyWong created for viewing stats of your AFD votes. I find it handy to look at to get an overview of my contributions there (not that I make many xFD contributions...). It's at [2]. Apologies if you already were aware of it. Begoon ^talk 03:34, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Seinfeld logo.svg

I restored the old revisions. Note that it did not log the action (another software bug). BTW, I don't know why they were unwilling to undelete at WP:REFUND; it was a trivial action. Maxim_(talk) 03:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Kendall Hart/Sarah Michelle Gellar image

George, I'm not going to revert you on this, but I want to ask why you felt the need to change the image? I know that one of your mentors (Elen of the Roads) stated that "The NFCC guidelines overall prefer publicity stills (not images from the likes of Getty or Associated Press, but from the company or individual) to screenshots." in the Requests for comment discussion, but that doesn't mean that you should replace acceptable images. The image you added is a large image of Gellar's face, and therefore seems disproportionate to Alicia Minshew's. I prefer images that at least show a good portion of the shoulders or whole body anyway. I may later trade out the image you uploaded for a different image. Flyer22 (talk) 23:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

If you do that, I want sources. --George Ho (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict)I did this because the previous image's source... well, I didn't like the screenshot image. The image's VHS resolution was... not that crisp. Mine is crispier. Why preferring the whole body to the whole face? What's the big deal? --George Ho (talk) 00:12, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Actually Flyer, I'm with George on this one. The previous image was a head shot, quite unlike the Alicia image. This one is crisper and a better image generally. You could take the discussion back to the talkpage if there are others who might express an opinion. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

I can see what Flyer is saying about the framing of the headshot - it's not the best framing I've ever seen, but the image is far and away better quality. I don't agree that it alters the "balance" between the 2 images. There never was any "balance" to speak of between a "most of body" and a headshot. I agree with Elen that you should discuss on the talkpage. If there's an even better image around, or one comes to light later, then great - but for the meantime, I'd be in favour of George's change, too. Begoon ^talk 00:31, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

George, I don't understand why you said you want sources. The only source needed, if any, is the website where I found the image, and the picture I uploaded came with a source...no matter if the source is not the best. It's not like any of these sites, other than ABC, hold the copyrights to these images. That's why they're called non-free. My information-formatting wasn't the best, but that's because I was a new Wikipedia editor when I uploaded that image. Why a whole-body shot or at least a half-body shot over a face shot? Because it presents more of the character's image. The same reason they are preferred for biographies of real people. You can't always get an idea of a character or person's body size from just a face shot, which can therefore be deceptive. I'm just saying that, in this case, I would have preferred you uploaded a shot that displays more than just the face.

Elen and Begoon, I'm not disputing that George's image is of better quality than the one I uploaded years ago. I am disputing George changing long-standing images when they are fine/acceptable. If I should discuss before changing his new image, then he should have discussed before changing the long-standing one. Unless a long-standing image is an image violation or is in dire need of change, I don't necessarily see a need for a change. There was no image violation or dire need of change in this case. To me, there was more balance with the previous image. Yes, it was also a headshot, but it was not a huge headshot and showed a good portion of her shoulders. I'd intended to upload an image (of Gellar) that created true balance, but I obviously never got around to that. And now George's image has made the inbalance worse, in my opinion. Flyer22 (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I've contributed hundreds of images to Wikipedia, including images uploaded by others that I've been asked to improve. Every few days, it seems, one of those images is replaced somewhere, or another user edits an image I provided. When that happens, I don't always necessarily see the need for change, either. But someone obviously does, or the change would not be made. After a while I realised it's just the same as people editing the textual content I've provided - just the way things work. So, when it comes to the need for discussion about changes to images, I just apply WP:BRD like any other edit - and that is what I would have done here had I seen this change and disagreed with it. That's pretty much what is happening except you were, additionally, polite enough to discuss before reverting, which is something I often try to do if I can, too, as best practice. The discussion might get more relevant eyes on the article talk page, was my main hope, in mentioning discussion - not an implication that anyone was doing anything wrong, or a suggestion of different requirements for different editors. If one of the things George enjoys doing is finding better images to use then that should be no different to an editor who copyedits and improves content he thinks could be better written. Begoon ^talk 02:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining your stance about discussion and giving insight into your experience with such matters. I agree. I'm not in a hurry to change George's image. I just wanted to let him know why I disagreed with his change and that I may later change it. Thank you. Both you and Elen, and your continual mentorship of George. Flyer22 (talk) 16:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Storm in a teacup

Probably start class right now, owing to lack of content. For what it's worth, PR is usually used for articles aimed at GA or FA. --Sarastro1 (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

October 2011 peer reviews

Back in October 2011 you started a number of peer reviews and never finished them. I have been cleaning them up - see Talk:Luke and Laura or Talk:List of Three's Company episodes for two examples. Can I please ask you not to do this in the future - in October 2011 peer reviews were limited to 4 per editor at a time, and the expectation is that if you open a peer review, you go on to properly do so (not just add the template to a talk page) and you are serious about following through and doing the work to fix the article. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

List of All My Children cast members

Please note that I have removed the merger proposal that you have placed on the article because its use never was justified on the article's talk page. If you feel its presence is still needed, please explain it on the discussion page. But I doubt that such proposal will ever be approved by the soap opera community, especially that all soap operas have separate articles for cast members and characters. So why it should it be different for All My Children?

Thank you. Farine (talk) 07:36, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I have discussed this in Talk:List of All My Children characters recently. --George Ho (talk) 07:41, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

AFD's

I think it is fair to say that you have been dishonest in AFD nominations. You keep claiming no sources are being found, but I keep having a quick browse on random AFD's you notify WP:SOAPS about - and find some on the first page of a google search. I've done this quite a few times now. I'm sorry but nominating a character who was on television for forty years and claiming zero notability is questionable. I'm sure that would pass GNG atleast. The series the character is from is aired in many countries around the globe. That just heightens the potential of sources being found, after all the character has been around enough to get coverage. I've made a plea to you before, to carry out these searches before nominating. However, it just appears that you are claiming you have and found no results returned. I'm not saying each soap opera character is notable, but when their is solid potential - you could consider merging. Something else that is not sitting quite right with me; the fact you said you plan to remove all the soap opera articles possible, then concentrate on removing lists. Flyer was correct in stating at AFD/Ethan Cambias, that such a statement just validates what soap opera editors think.Rain the 1 19:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

What do you want me to say: I have done a poor research effort? I'm using poor excuses to validate my claims? I have to let bad editors infringe Soapcentral? I have to risk further bad editings by merging/redirecting without deletion nominations? That I want to erase soap elements because soaps are the past yet no efforts to historicize soaps are done or appropiate? What else do you want me to say? --George Ho (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Please don't see this as an intrusion, but can we also have a discussion about this on the mentorship page? Not urgent, and I've had a loss in the family, so won't be around much for a couple of days - but it does strike me that there might be benefit in a bit of focus, away from the "fray", in due course. Begoon ^talk 09:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:File

George, you don't need to delete it, just to change the FUR to a free use one and the license to PD. We hope (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I was going to upload it to Commons without the need to change it to free in the English Wiki; in fact, I'm going to upload it.. --George Ho (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

No problem ;-)We hope (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Spring in a Small Town poster.jpg

Hello George Ho, just to let you know, the file page you created at File:Spring in a Small Town poster.jpg does not have a file. If the commons file is deleted, it will leave behind a blank English Wikipedia description page. In order to upload the file locally, you need to use Special:Upload. Thank you, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Marty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, George Ho. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requested templates.
Message added 09:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

mabdul 09:47, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

The Final Frontier (Mad About You)

Ive created the above just now, but a little tired. See if you can get to something, else ill come back in a day or 2 s as to DYK it before the deadlineLihaas (talk) 02:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I THINK so...been busy with olympics stuff ;)Lihaas (talk) 19:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

How do you get RS sources on info? google searchonly turns up how to "Watch" it (and probs illegally)Lihaas (talk) 01:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Moving Perfect Strangers (U.S. TV series)

Hi again, George. I removed your listing for moving Perfect Strangers (U.S. TV series), as I've already tagged the redirect that's holding up the move with {{db-move}}, per instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Non-admin closure. In the past when I've done this, an admin makes the move after deleting the old redirect. I just figured it didn't make much sense to have it listed in two places. It should get taken care of shortly. Thanks, BDD (talk) 22:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

It takes two

Well hi, George, and real thanks for the heads up. Thing is, i used twinkle to propose the deletion and somehow tw sent to you. I don't know why. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 03:41, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Haha, maybe I should, but well, you can't deny that Twinkle makes nominating pages for deletion so much more convenient. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheers (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tax return (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Give Me a Ring Sometime (Cheers)

Please seek consensus to redirect such an important and substantial article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, George Ho. You have new messages at Hahc21's talk page.
Message added 23:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— ΛΧΣ21™ 23:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Tagged files

Think they are all tagged and are here Category:File at CCI by Wikiwatcher1. Someone asked me about this back in August and I thought the person who asked was tagging for this. If you find any files from someone who's part of a CCI, you can see the template to use on the files in the category. Thanks for pointing this out, as I thought they were done in August. We hope (talk) 22:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Anonymous IP

Hmm, would AIVing him do the trick? Blake Gripling (talk) 06:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Channel line up

Had we already reached a consensus related to this matter? You have been removing channel lineups, especially from Philippine wiki pages. We can discuss this at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#NOTDIR include current channel listings. Channel lineups constantly change and Wikipedia can be used as an alternative, since most cable provider websites and even barker channels are not updated regularly. Vgyu 10:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

• • Hello!!
    • Why you removed the current channel line-up especially in the Philippines. If fact this issue already case close last year and discussed already in Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#NOTDIR include current channel listings. However, there is no rule that channel line-up removing state there. Or you just imagine what you are doing. Please stop this or you will block for editing. Mind your own article and mind your own country. Puppyph 01:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

George Ho, this user (PinoiBIGscientian) has added back the channel lists in SkyCable article without consensus. ApprenticeFan ^work 03:37, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Cheers (season 2)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Fab Five: The Texas Cheerleader Scandal

Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Cheers

An idea for citations for the character is to use, like the Harry Potter characters, use a note that mentions which episode the the info comes from instead f interrupting the flow with the mention within the prose itself.

Also I think the season openers and closers are notable enough to create. Im creating some stuff for Birth, Death, Love and Rice and the Little Match Girl now. Check it out later.Lihaas (talk) 05:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Just worked on, its similar in notability to Home is the Sailor. Why the overlap concern?

Im just working on it, can you give me a bit?

Yep, case in point. Should they be merged? Theres notability outside the plot too?

Cool, just watching it again and then ill do the plot tonight.

Hello George

Hello George

I hope you are well.

Firstly, I need to apologise that ႈႈႈI disappeared so abruptly. I simply had to put real life first - I'm sorry.

However, I have looked in from time to time with interest, and it's cheered me up on many occasions to see how well things seem to be going here for you now.

I've seen the work you are doing at DYK, and other places, and you seem to be going from strength to strength, which makes me very happy.

I won't be around for much more than a few minutes a day for a while, but I will be popping in most days.

I don't think you need much advice these days (I might even come to you for that...) - but I'll be around a little if you want to talk about anything.

Again, sorry for the "vanishing act", and take care... Begoon ^talk 11:35, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:IP 12.153.112.21/List of AT&T U-verse channels

If it returns to the mainspace without significant improvement, WP:CSD#G4. WilyD 06:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

• It seems like a redirect to an appropriate place, and although I didn't investigate, someone's claiming it's necessary for attribution. What would you want to do? WilyD 14:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Assuming that the content has been merged elsewhere, prior revisions couldn't be deleted without violating the license anyhow. Unless they're copy-vios or attack pages, what do you care? WilyD 14:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
• I'm not sure I totally grok what you're asking, but the simple answer is "When it comes to potential copyright violations, better safe than sorry". If there's some reason the redirect is inherently problematic, one could do a histmerge to ensure attribution remains; but I don't see a call for it. WilyD 07:22, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Maybe point 1 (which is typically tough to figure out when there's been merging) and probably point 4 (RfD tends not to delete article titles that may be externally linked). Given the history, probably 5 as well. WilyD 07:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
    • No, point 4 refers to links coming into a redirect from outside Wikipedia - redirects that have existed for a while (either as redirects or articles) are typically kept at RfD if it's plausible they're linked from websites outside Wikipedia (Which applies in this case, but typically wouldn't save a redirect like Atbnds93245fedsfgsd9241, even if it were old). WilyD 07:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
      • You're free to try RfD, of course, but the precedent is that old redirects are typical kept if it's plausible someone external may have linked to them, unless there's a compelling reason to delete. WilyD 08:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Sorry to butt in, but George asked me about this too. I see no harm whatsoever in the redirect to the article. Redirects are cheap and unimportant, unless they are deceptive or incorrect in some way. I don't see that this one is. If there is something specific in the history at the redirect which you think is a copyvio issue, then it could be removed with RD1 (unless that breaks attribution). Lists though, correct me if I'm wrong, often don't meet the originality threshold for copyright (I haven't examined this one in any detail). Other than that I don't see any real problems here. People don't come here to "look" at the redirect - they get redirected by it, and if it might, however unlikely, get even one reader to the right place it's wrong to delete it. It's only we editors who would even know to check the history of a redirect, not readers, and Wikipedia is written for the readers, (or, at least, should be...) It sounds a little bit from some of your comments that you're upset there is no red "deleted" banner at the page. That's not a reader-friendly way of looking at things. Editors who want to know the history at AFD will find it - it's in the page logs - readers don't care. Begoon ^talk 09:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
      • Adding: I saw your post at VPP - I'll post this here, rather than there. "It's a redirect. How can a redirect violate WP:NOTDIR?"

You seem to be getting very anxious about something unimportant - am I missing something here? Can you explain something "bad" that can happen if the redirect is not deleted - because I really can't see it. Begoon ^talk 13:14, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, so you tried to clarify it - but it still doesn't make sense. So it used to be a page that violated WP:NOTDIR. So what? It's not now. Lots of good pages used to be horrible, and now they are not. We don't delete them for that reason. All the horridness still exists in the histories, whether they are now redirects, or good pages. We just don't clean up to that extent, or histories would be pointless.

I suspect you think it's "unfair" because the AFD resulted in delete, and then it got userfied, moved to mainspace, and truncated to a redirect. You think the history should have been deleted forever. Maybe, but really, it doesn't matter this much. There are lots of far worse old articles and content than this lurking in page histories.

If you like, nominate it for deletion - WilyD and I could both be wrong. I care as little if it gets deleted as if it doesn't - except for the precedent which says we shouldn't delete even remotely plausible redirects because - well, because it's pointless, and unnecessary, and just might inconvenience someone, one day. While it does no harm, no need to do anything. Begoon ^talk 13:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I believe that all users should get a second chance, so here it is! Thanks for your efforts to making sure Wikipedia has good image rationales! If you need any help, or want to ask a question, you know where my talk page is! :D — M.Mario (T/C) 16:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Fair use in UK

Hi George

I noticed your edit summary here: [3].

You've probably already seen this, but just in case you haven't: Copyright Law fact sheet P-09 : Understanding Fair Use.

I'm not sure what that means for Wikipedia, since we use US fair use based on the server location as far as I can tell, but you would know more about that than I do anyway. Begoon ^talk 03:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi George

Hello, George Ho/Archives/2012. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

George, if you get a second, could you confirm you recieved the mail, so that I know it worked ok? Thanks. Begoon ^talk 01:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I've received your mails. I must say that unanimous decision from you and most active users is required to end official requirement for mentorship. Alternatively, you can no longer be my mentor if you wish. --George Ho (talk) 01:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Ok - well I get the feeling I've upset or confused you. I'm extremely sorry about that - it's exactly the opposite of what I intended to do. I won't do anything else on the matter unless you ask me to. Begoon ^talk 02:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I am not upset over your decisions; really! In fact, I am glad that you inspected my work. I'm really thankful. Do what you and I may request but at caution. As I said, if you want to have unblock mentorship ended, you may, but there are others who may mistrust or be wary of me still. --George Ho (talk) 02:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

I am very relieved to hear that. I have great respect for you and your work. I do not wish to stop being a mentor, I am very happy to remain one as long as you would like me to. Begoon ^talk 02:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

With pleasure; I'll let you know when I want your help anytime. --George Ho (talk) 02:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. Thanks.Begoon ^talk 02:45, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

WP:DYKSTATS

Hey George Ho. I had a question, about DYKSTATS page. I am obviously new to DYK and I saw all of the mathematic formulas for the page counts. On the Vernon C. Bain Correctional Center entry you adjusted the numbers see here. Its no worry to me as the difference is small, but where did you come up with those numbers to add and subtract and what not? Mostly I'm just curious. Thanks for the information, maybe next time (if there is a next time) I can do that math ahead of time. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

That makes perfect sense! Thank you for the information; it is so obvious, but I never would have figured it out. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:RB Stratos test jump - Felix Baumgartner in free fall ((c) Luke Aikins Red Bull Content Pool).jpg

Hi George, I just_now removed your TL added 2012-12-05. If you think it might help for the file beeing kept, please just REVERT. Such would be in the sence of RB, allowing WP to use the file, and probably also WP's. Best, [w.] 22:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Every non-free image should be small, reducing risks of affecting commercial opportunities of this image. I'm not trying to delete it; I just want the smaller version of this image. --George Ho (talk) 22:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Non-free images of Another Sad Love Song

I say keep File:Toni Braxton - Another Sad Love Song U.S..jpg and File:Toni Braxton - Another Sad Love Song UK (1994).jpg, as they differ heavily from each other; remove the other two. SnapSnap 02:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I just assumed it was IP vandalism, my bad. Indeed her discography confirms she covered it. I might as well look for a reliable source some other time, or I could just use {{cite album-notes}}. SnapSnap 04:33, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, George Ho. You have new messages at Hahc21's talk page.
Message added 05:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— ΛΧΣ²¹ 05:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)