User talk:George Ho/Archives/2009
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Could you please discuss what's so wrong with it?Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
How does it look now?Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I don't know anything about "inappropriate tone". I have tried to update, but I didn't get around to it today and probably won't tomorrow. Though this week should be a very good time for updating articles on this and related topics, being two months after the end of analog.
I found something on Mobile DTV and I updated the appropriate article. I didn't actually look for anything on the boxes specifically. I really didn't do much a search.
Thanks.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
I guess so, although even better would be to just fix the article or just start a topic on the discussion page. Always much better then simply tagging. This edit really was overtagging, the article is not so bad that it needs six warnings. Garion96 (talk) 10:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to let you know I expanded the article about the 1941 version as well. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 17:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I expanded the 1960 version, too, but unfortunately not by much. As much as I looked I couldn't find a lot of information about it. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 19:43, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Templates
Please don't template the regulars as you did here. It just annoys people. Also, when issuing warnings, please use the first strength of warning first rather than jumping to a higher number immediately as that just annoys as well. Except on the talk pages of regulars, where you should use your own words, not a template. Thanks. ↪REDVERS The internet is for porn 08:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Card Game (pricing game) and others
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Card Game (pricing game), Any Number. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Card Game (pricing game) for Card Game (pricing game), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Any Number for Any Number. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)